Figures & data
Figure 3. 3D FEM of primary structures for AP1000.
Reprinted from Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, Tuñón-Sanjur L. et al., Finite element modeling of the AP1000 nuclear island for seismic analyses at generic soil and rock sites, 1474–1485, Copyright (2007), with permission from Elsevier.
![Figure 3. 3D FEM of primary structures for AP1000.Reprinted from Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, Tuñón-Sanjur L. et al., Finite element modeling of the AP1000 nuclear island for seismic analyses at generic soil and rock sites, 1474–1485, Copyright (2007), with permission from Elsevier.](/cms/asset/aa42871e-6518-48d2-a67d-9905df1175df/tnst_a_1532846_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. LMBM of substructures for AP1000.
Reprinted from Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, Tuñón-Sanjur L. et al., Finite element modeling of the AP1000 nuclear island for seismic analyses at generic soil and rock sites, 1474–1485, Copyright (2007), with permission from Elsevier.
![Figure 4. LMBM of substructures for AP1000.Reprinted from Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237, Tuñón-Sanjur L. et al., Finite element modeling of the AP1000 nuclear island for seismic analyses at generic soil and rock sites, 1474–1485, Copyright (2007), with permission from Elsevier.](/cms/asset/8e7da1fa-7ee8-4440-8d80-69ba86c7cc5e/tnst_a_1532846_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. 3D FEM of multi-axis loading tests on RC shear walls.
Reprinted from Nuclear Engineering and Design, 295, Syed S. and Gupta A., Seismic fragility of RC shear walls in nuclear power plant part 2: Influence of uncertainty in material parameters on fragility of concrete shear walls, 587–596, Copyright (2015), with permission from Elsevier.
![Figure 5. 3D FEM of multi-axis loading tests on RC shear walls.Reprinted from Nuclear Engineering and Design, 295, Syed S. and Gupta A., Seismic fragility of RC shear walls in nuclear power plant part 2: Influence of uncertainty in material parameters on fragility of concrete shear walls, 587–596, Copyright (2015), with permission from Elsevier.](/cms/asset/da57782c-fe03-4ada-aa85-1f58aa321293/tnst_a_1532846_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. 3D FEM of Hualien large-scale seismic test.
Reprinted from Nuclear Engineering and Design, 295, Kabanda J. et al., Time and frequency domain analyses of the Hualien large-scale seismic test, 261–275, Copyright (2015), with permission from Elsevier.
![Figure 7. 3D FEM of Hualien large-scale seismic test.Reprinted from Nuclear Engineering and Design, 295, Kabanda J. et al., Time and frequency domain analyses of the Hualien large-scale seismic test, 261–275, Copyright (2015), with permission from Elsevier.](/cms/asset/185609ba-cf46-4e04-bf9a-8984f2597557/tnst_a_1532846_f0007_b.gif)
Figure 8. 3D FEM of containment structure.
This figure is reprinted under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
![Figure 8. 3D FEM of containment structure.This figure is reprinted under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).](/cms/asset/60d0772d-df02-4540-860d-4f45bb5d2120/tnst_a_1532846_f0008_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Key directions for future studies