326
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Calculation of the ideal isochronous field for the SC200 cyclotron using the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm

, , , &
Pages 217-223 | Received 14 Jun 2019, Accepted 26 Aug 2019, Published online: 22 Sep 2019

Figures & data

Table 1. Main parameters of the SC200 cyclotron

Figure 1. Overview of the flutter field of the SC200 cyclotron

Figure 1. Overview of the flutter field of the SC200 cyclotron

Figure 2. Flow chart for the Nelder-Mead simplex method

Figure 2. Flow chart for the Nelder-Mead simplex method

Figure 3. Flow chart for calculating the objective function

Figure 3. Flow chart for calculating the objective function

Figure 4. Comparison of the isochronous field obtained from Gordon’s method, the gyration frequency-based method, and the 12th-order simplex method

Figure 4. Comparison of the isochronous field obtained from Gordon’s method, the gyration frequency-based method, and the 12th-order simplex method

Figure 5. Difference between the isochronous field obtained from Gordon’s method, the gyration frequency-based method, and the 12th-order simplex method

Figure 5. Difference between the isochronous field obtained from Gordon’s method, the gyration frequency-based method, and the 12th-order simplex method

Figure 6. Relative error in the orbital frequency of Gordon’s method, the gyration frequency-based method, and the 12th-order simplex method

Figure 6. Relative error in the orbital frequency of Gordon’s method, the gyration frequency-based method, and the 12th-order simplex method

Figure 7. Comparison of the integrated phase slip during acceleration from 150 MeV to 200 MeV

Figure 7. Comparison of the integrated phase slip during acceleration from 150 MeV to 200 MeV

Figure 8. Time cost for different-order simplex methods (left), and the value of the objective function for different-order simplex methods during the iterations (right)

Figure 8. Time cost for different-order simplex methods (left), and the value of the objective function for different-order simplex methods during the iterations (right)

Figure 9. Overview of the pole structure for SC200 (left), starting and optimized pole geometry (middle), and the angular width of the poles before and after shimming (right)

Figure 9. Overview of the pole structure for SC200 (left), starting and optimized pole geometry (middle), and the angular width of the poles before and after shimming (right)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.