A Comparison of Multilevel Mediation Modeling Methods: Recommendations for Applied Researchers

Abstract

Multilevel structural equation modeling (MSEM) has been proposed as a valuable tool for estimating mediation in multilevel data and has known advantages over traditional multilevel modeling, including conflated and unconflated techniques (CMM & UMM). Recent methodological research has focused on comparing the three methods for 2-1-1 designs, but in regards to 1-1-1 mediation designs, there are significant gaps in the published literature that prevent applied researchers from making educated decisions regarding which model to employ in their own specific research design. A Monte Carlo study was performed to compare MSEM, UMM, and CMM on relative bias, confidence interval coverage, Type I Error, and power in a 1-1-1 model with random slopes under varying data conditions. Recommendations for applied researchers are discussed and an empirical example provides context for the three methods.

Keywords:

• Mediation
• Monte Carlo studies
• multilevel modeling
• structural equation modeling

Article Information

Conflict of interest disclosures: Each author signed a form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No authors reported any financial or other conflicts of interest in relation to the work described.

Ethical Principles: The authors affirm having followed professional ethical guidelines in preparing this work. These guidelines include obtaining informed consent from human participants, maintaining ethical treatment and respect for the rights of human or animal participants, and ensuring the privacy of participants and their data, such as ensuring that individual participants cannot be identified in reported results or from publicly available original or archival data.

Funding: This work was not supported.

Role of the funders/sponsors: None of the funders or sponsors of this research had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank Dr. Ming-Te Wang for providing access to the dataset used for the empirical example. The authors are also grateful to the associate editor and 2 reviewers, whose thoughtful suggestions and comments truly strengthened the manuscript. Finally, the authors acknowledge the invaluable contributions of the late Dr. Kevin Kim, whose mentorship allowed for the conception of this project. The ideas and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors alone and endorsement by the authors' institutions is not intended and should not be inferred