622
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematics

The Inocybe geophylla group in North America: a revision of the lilac species surrounding I. lilacina

ORCID Icon &
Pages 618-634 | Received 21 Nov 2017, Accepted 24 Apr 2018, Published online: 22 Jun 2018
 

ABSTRACT

The Inocybe geophylla group is circumscribed based on phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences largely sampled from North America and Europe. Twenty-nine phylogenetic species are uncovered after analysis of combined nuc 28S rDNA (28S) and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (rpb2) DNA sequence data. Species in the I. geophylla group share the presence of a cortina, silky-fibrillose pileus and stipe, pruinose stipe apex, spermatic odor, thick-walled hymenial cystidia, and smooth amygdaliform or elliptical basidiospores. Within the group, as many as five phylogenetic species attributable to I. lilacina and allies form a strongly supported clade based on analysis of nuc ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 rDNA (ITS [internal transcribed spacer]), 28S, and rpb2 data. However, all lilac-colored species do not form a monophyletic group. Sufficient morphological and ecological data are present to document four of the I. lilacina subgroup species, two of which are described from North America as new: I. ionocephala and I. sublilacina. Inocybe lilacina is recircumscribed based on sequencing the holotype and is distributed in the eastern United States under pines and/or hardwoods. Inocybe pallidicremea is a widespread and common conifer associate in mostly northern parts of North America, to which the name I. lilacina was previously applied. Descriptions, photographs, line drawings, and a taxonomic key to lilac species in the I. lilacina subgroup from North America are provided. Well-documented collections, especially notes on gross morphology and ecology, are needed to continue to assess and describe the high taxonomic variation in the I. lilacina subgroup and its allies worldwide.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Laboratory support was provided by Christine Braaten, Emily Giles, Alicia Hobbs, Hailee Korotkin, Sarah Sprague, and Aaron Wolfenbarger. The following individuals are thanked for donation of materials or supporting information: Joe Ammirati, Tom Bruns, Cathy Cripps, Vera Evenson, David Giblin, Kabir Peay, Roy Halling, Karen Hughes, Renée Lebeuf, Lorinda Leonardi, Brian Looney, David Malloch, Buck McAdoo, Steve Trudell, Andy Wilson, Mike Wood, Andrus Voitk, and Maria Yousoufian. We thank the following herbaria and staff for providing loans of materials: DBG, MONT, NY, NYS, TENN, UC, and WTU. The authors thank Keith Seifert and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and feedback on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Supplemental data

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s Web site.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this work was provided by grants to P.B.M. from the Daniel E. Stuntz Memorial Foundation and the Hesler Endowment Fund at the University of Tennessee.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 122.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.