Figures & data
Table 1 Experimental comparisons (r = ram, c = cryptorchid, w = wether, e = ewe), number of animals (n), estimated age (days, weeks or months) or liveweight target at slaughter (kg) and range of mean carcass weights collated from the scientific literature for the present study.
Table 2 The effects of sex type on carcass weight of rams, cryptorchids (Crypt.) and wethers slaughtered at the same time within each experiment. S = a significant effect of sex type recorded in the original report (within rows different superscripts indicate the types that varied significantly); NS = no significant effect reported.
Fig. 1 Carcass weight, liveweight gain, fatness, and dressing-out% in cryptorchids (solid diamonds) and wethers (open circles) compared with rams (=100%, broken line) in individual experiments comparing all three sex types. The studies have been arranged along the horizontal axis according to the average weight of the ram carcases in each experiment.
![Fig. 1 Carcass weight, liveweight gain, fatness, and dressing-out% in cryptorchids (solid diamonds) and wethers (open circles) compared with rams (=100%, broken line) in individual experiments comparing all three sex types. The studies have been arranged along the horizontal axis according to the average weight of the ram carcases in each experiment.](/cms/asset/9316e262-4538-4fc0-9811-a6b629a0412d/tnza_a_478289_o_f0001g.gif)