690
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Evaluation of refractive index for measuring urinary nitrogen concentration in a sensor worn by grazing female cattle

, , , , &
Pages 23-31 | Received 16 Jun 2016, Accepted 14 Sep 2016, Published online: 24 Oct 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. AgResearch urine sensor assembly (left) and attachment on a cow (right).

Figure 1. AgResearch urine sensor assembly (left) and attachment on a cow (right).

Table 1. Summary of nitrogen, potassium and sodium concentrations of the urine samples from different feed types used to evaluate refractive index. K and Na concentrations were not measured in urine from the mixed pasture. The average least significant difference value (LSD) for P = 0.05 is presented.

Figure 2. The relationship between N and K concentrations in urine from cattle fed monocultures of clover, ryegrass or turnips. Prediction confidence intervals for the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile intervals are shown.

Figure 2. The relationship between N and K concentrations in urine from cattle fed monocultures of clover, ryegrass or turnips. Prediction confidence intervals for the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile intervals are shown.

Figure 3. The regression between urine sensor refractive index (RI) value and urinary-N concentration from cows fed on ryegrass (n = 48 samples from six cows), clover (n = 48 samples from six cows), turnip (n = 46 samples from six cows) or a mixed ryegrass/clover pasture (n = 26). Prediction confidence intervals for the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile intervals are shown.

Figure 3. The regression between urine sensor refractive index (RI) value and urinary-N concentration from cows fed on ryegrass (n = 48 samples from six cows), clover (n = 48 samples from six cows), turnip (n = 46 samples from six cows) or a mixed ryegrass/clover pasture (n = 26). Prediction confidence intervals for the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile intervals are shown.

Table 2. Regression coefficients (with standard error) for the relationship between refractive index and urinary nitrogen and urinary potassium concentrations for each feed type.

Figure 4. The regression between urine sensor refractive index (RI) value and urinary-K concentration from cows fed ryegrass (n = 24 samples from three cows), clover (n = 24 samples from three cows) or turnip (n = 24 samples from three cows). Prediction confidence intervals for the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile intervals are shown.

Figure 4. The regression between urine sensor refractive index (RI) value and urinary-K concentration from cows fed ryegrass (n = 24 samples from three cows), clover (n = 24 samples from three cows) or turnip (n = 24 samples from three cows). Prediction confidence intervals for the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile intervals are shown.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.