1,293
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Establishing native plants in a weedy riparian environment

, , &
Pages 357-367 | Received 21 Dec 2010, Accepted 14 May 2011, Published online: 31 Aug 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1 Sherry River trial site layout. Locations of replicated plots are indicated by numbers 1–10.

Figure 1  Sherry River trial site layout. Locations of replicated plots are indicated by numbers 1–10.

Table 1  Estimated costs of different weed-control treatments per seedling over 2 years

Figure 2 Variation in seedling survival with weed-control treatment from 2005 to 2007. Letters indicate statistically significant differences in numbers of surviving seedlings between treatments at α = 0.05.

Figure 2  Variation in seedling survival with weed-control treatment from 2005 to 2007. Letters indicate statistically significant differences in numbers of surviving seedlings between treatments at α = 0.05.

Figure 3 Variation between species in seedling survival from 2005 to 2007. Letters indicate statistically significant differences in numbers of surviving seedlings between species at α = 0.05.

Figure 3  Variation between species in seedling survival from 2005 to 2007. Letters indicate statistically significant differences in numbers of surviving seedlings between species at α = 0.05.

Figure 4 Effects of weed-control treatment on height increments of surviving seedlings from 2005 to 2007 (means with error bars indicating SEM; n=34 for control, 48 for herbicide and 37 for carpet and weed mat). Letters indicate statistically significant differences in mean height increment between treatments at α = 0.05.

Figure 4  Effects of weed-control treatment on height increments of surviving seedlings from 2005 to 2007 (means with error bars indicating SEM; n=34 for control, 48 for herbicide and 37 for carpet and weed mat). Letters indicate statistically significant differences in mean height increment between treatments at α = 0.05.

Figure 5 Differences between species in height increments of surviving seedlings from 2005 to 2007 (means with error bars indicating SEM; n=1 for Aristotelia serrata, 34 for Cordyline australis, 16 for Coprosma robusta, 22 for Kunzea ericoides, 25 for Plagianthus regius, 28 for Pittosporum tenuifolium and 30 for Podocarpus totara). Letters indicate statistically significant differences in mean height increment between species at α = 0.05. No error bar or letter is presented for A. serrata as only one specimen survived.

Figure 5  Differences between species in height increments of surviving seedlings from 2005 to 2007 (means with error bars indicating SEM; n=1 for Aristotelia serrata, 34 for Cordyline australis, 16 for Coprosma robusta, 22 for Kunzea ericoides, 25 for Plagianthus regius, 28 for Pittosporum tenuifolium and 30 for Podocarpus totara). Letters indicate statistically significant differences in mean height increment between species at α = 0.05. No error bar or letter is presented for A. serrata as only one specimen survived.

Figure 6 Effects of weed-control treatment on crown area increments of surviving seedlings from 2005 to 2007 (Means with error bars indicating SEM; n as for ). Letters indicate statistically significant differences in mean crown area increment between treatments at α = 0.05.

Figure 6  Effects of weed-control treatment on crown area increments of surviving seedlings from 2005 to 2007 (Means with error bars indicating SEM; n as for Fig. 4). Letters indicate statistically significant differences in mean crown area increment between treatments at α = 0.05.

Figure 7 Differences between species in crown area increments of surviving seedlings from 2005 to 2007 (Means with error bars indicating SEM; n as for ). Letters indicate statistically significant differences in mean crown area increment between species at α = 0.05. No error bar or letter is presented for Aristotelia serrata, as only one specimen survived.

Figure 7  Differences between species in crown area increments of surviving seedlings from 2005 to 2007 (Means with error bars indicating SEM; n as for Fig. 5). Letters indicate statistically significant differences in mean crown area increment between species at α = 0.05. No error bar or letter is presented for Aristotelia serrata, as only one specimen survived.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.