3,923
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Does one size fit all? An evaluation of length–weight relationships for New Zealand's freshwater fish species

, , , &
Pages 450-468 | Received 05 Oct 2012, Accepted 14 Feb 2013, Published online: 26 Jun 2013

Figures & data

Table 1 Estimated parameters of length–weight relationships for 53 freshwater fish species in New Zealand using wet-weight data (except for Stokellia anisodon which were preserved in formalin). Parameters are given for power equations and 95% CI for a are provided in Table S1. Quadratic parameters are supplied in Table S2 if they were selected as the better model. For the ‘Origin’ column: N = native, I = introduced, M = marine wanderer, E = extinct. NA = not available.

Table 2 Estimated parameters of length–weight power relationships for New Zealand freshwater fish species for which dry-weight data was available. Quadratic parameters are supplied in Table S3 if they were selected as the better model.

Figure 1 Scatterplot of log10a and b parameters based on body shape for 52 New Zealand freshwater fish species. For clarity, the data point for Atlantic salmon has been omitted from the plot.
Figure 1 Scatterplot of log10a and b parameters based on body shape for 52 New Zealand freshwater fish species. For clarity, the data point for Atlantic salmon has been omitted from the plot.

Table 3 Differences in length–weight relationships between locations. Equations are only provided for those species where a significant difference between the North and South Islands was detected (the list of species for which no significant differences were detected are in Table S4).

Table 4 Differences in length–weight relationships for male and female fishes. Equations are only provided for those species where a significant difference between the sexes was detected. Note that values for a and b may be markedly different to those in because less data was used across a more limited size range.

Figure 2 The relationship between measured and predicted fish weight for 25 sites around New Zealand. Predicted fish weights were calculated using both power and quadratic equations from . Note that two separate regression lines are not visible because the fitted relationships were equivalent when both methods were used.
Figure 2 The relationship between measured and predicted fish weight for 25 sites around New Zealand. Predicted fish weights were calculated using both power and quadratic equations from Table 1. Note that two separate regression lines are not visible because the fitted relationships were equivalent when both methods were used.
Supplemental material

tnzm_a_781510_sm2681.doc

Download MS Word (110.5 KB)

tnzm_a_781510_sm2682.doc

Download MS Word (51 KB)

tnzm_a_781510_sm2683.doc

Download MS Word (39.5 KB)

tnzm_a_781510_sm2684.doc

Download MS Word (43 KB)

tnzm_a_781510_sm2680.doc

Download MS Word (108.5 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.