435
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Movements in the harlequin fish (Othos dentex), a large predatory serranid from southern Australia: implications for detection and protection

&
Pages 600-618 | Received 19 Jan 2016, Accepted 10 May 2016, Published online: 13 Jul 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. Map showing: A, The study region within Australia; B, the Ironstone Hill study site on NE Kangaroo Island in relation to Gulf St Vincent and Backstairs Passage; C, the locations of the seven receivers adjacent to Ironstone Hill. The circles around each receiver indicate a 200 m detection radius.

Figure 1. Map showing: A, The study region within Australia; B, the Ironstone Hill study site on NE Kangaroo Island in relation to Gulf St Vincent and Backstairs Passage; C, the locations of the seven receivers adjacent to Ironstone Hill. The circles around each receiver indicate a 200 m detection radius.

Table 1. Summary of the 10 harlequin fish tagged within the receiver array.

Figure 2. Time series of all daily detections within the receiver array for each of the 10 harlequin fish from June 2010 to October 2011. The control transmitter was detected every day and is not plotted.

Figure 2. Time series of all daily detections within the receiver array for each of the 10 harlequin fish from June 2010 to October 2011. The control transmitter was detected every day and is not plotted.

Figure 3. Receiver detections against time for the 10-day period between 8 July 2010 and 18 July 2010 for harlequin Fish 1 to 9 and the control transmitter.

Figure 3. Receiver detections against time for the 10-day period between 8 July 2010 and 18 July 2010 for harlequin Fish 1 to 9 and the control transmitter.

Figure 4. Depth detections against time for the 10-day period between 8 July 2010 and 18 July 2010 for harlequin Fish 1 to 9.

Figure 4. Depth detections against time for the 10-day period between 8 July 2010 and 18 July 2010 for harlequin Fish 1 to 9.

Figure 5. Diel activity pattern for all fish combined: mean (±SE) control-corrected standardised detection frequency per hourly bin for harlequin Fish 1 to 9.

Figure 5. Diel activity pattern for all fish combined: mean (±SE) control-corrected standardised detection frequency per hourly bin for harlequin Fish 1 to 9.

Figure 6. Depth utilisation by harlequin Fish 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9 during the day and night. Data are percentages of the total number of depth detections across 1 m depth classes for day (0900–1600 h) and night (2100–0400 h). Depth classes are 0–1 m (=1), 1–2 m (=2), etc. Note that the y axis range varies between fish. The black bar on the day graphs indicates the night modal depth.

Figure 6. Depth utilisation by harlequin Fish 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9 during the day and night. Data are percentages of the total number of depth detections across 1 m depth classes for day (0900–1600 h) and night (2100–0400 h). Depth classes are 0–1 m (=1), 1–2 m (=2), etc. Note that the y axis range varies between fish. The black bar on the day graphs indicates the night modal depth.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.