1,674
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Challenges related to interdisciplinary use of digital mapping technology in primary and lower secondary schools

Pages 162-171 | Received 31 May 2012, Accepted 18 Feb 2013, Published online: 26 Jun 2013

Figures & data

Table 1. Selected map and/or coordinate-relevant competence objectives from the core curriculum (Knowledge Promotion Reform) (Utdanningsdirektoratet 2006)

Table 2. Seven different competencies associated with the student project, using a three-point distribution of competence levels and competence requirements in accordance with Isnes's (2007) taxonomy (knowledge ladder, based on Bloom's (1956) taxonomy) used in curriculum work; ‘x’ indicates which competence level the students had reached

Fig. 1.  Screen dump of the results from one of the groups that had recorded the most waypoints (after being motivated by the promise of a reward)

Note the cluster of points in the lower right corner of the map. Image reproduced with the kind permission of Garmin.

Fig. 1.  Screen dump of the results from one of the groups that had recorded the most waypoints (after being motivated by the promise of a reward) Note the cluster of points in the lower right corner of the map. Image reproduced with the kind permission of Garmin.

Fig. 2.  Screen dump of a map showing possible sites for nesting boxes, obtained from a hand-held GPS receiver. Image reproduced with the kind permission of Garmin.

Fig. 2.  Screen dump of a map showing possible sites for nesting boxes, obtained from a hand-held GPS receiver. Image reproduced with the kind permission of Garmin.

Table 3. Sample statements (3 out of a total of 28) for which pupils in Grades 8 and 9 had to give their opinions before and after the project period; the response options were: ‘thoroughly agree’, ‘agree’, ‘disagree’, and ‘thoroughly disagree’; the differences in scores were tested for each student pairwise (n = valid pairs) before and after using the non-parametric Wilcoxon's Signed Rank Test