865
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Papers

Density-Driven Mass Transfer in Repositories for Nuclear Waste

& ORCID Icon
Pages 819-829 | Received 10 May 2018, Accepted 15 Oct 2018, Published online: 09 Nov 2018

Figures & data

Fig. 1. Illustration of concentration profile in the water in a vertical slot in contact with the buffer with concentration co at its surface, indicated by the solid arrow to the left.

Fig. 1. Illustration of concentration profile in the water in a vertical slot in contact with the buffer with concentration co at its surface, indicated by the solid arrow to the left.

Fig. 2. Qeq as a function of fracture transmissivity for two different hydraulic gradients.

Fig. 2. Qeq as a function of fracture transmissivity for two different hydraulic gradients.

Fig. 3. (a) Velocity and (b) penetration depth as a function of transmissivity for cubic law fractures.

Fig. 3. (a) Velocity and (b) penetration depth as a function of transmissivity for cubic law fractures.

Fig. 4. Fracture aperture δc versus transmissivity T.

Fig. 4. Fracture aperture δc versus transmissivity T.

Fig. 5. The flowing stream with low concentration takes up salt from water in the fracture and from the surrounding porous rock matrix with higher salt concentration.

Fig. 5. The flowing stream with low concentration takes up salt from water in the fracture and from the surrounding porous rock matrix with higher salt concentration.

Fig. 6. Plots of the concentration evolution 200 m above the source based on Eq. (20) for three combinations of transmissivity and density-induced gradient.

Fig. 6. Plots of the concentration evolution 200 m above the source based on Eq. (20) for three combinations of transmissivity and density-induced gradient.

TABLE I Equivalent Flow Rates from Analytical Solution and Numerical Calculations Using Dw = 10−9 m2/s, μw = 0.001 Pa s, and Δρρ=0.001, Height zo = 20 m

Fig. 7. The flow field and concentration profile in a 220-m-high fracture with a 20-m-high source in the lower left corner for T = 10−8 and a density difference of (a) Δρρ= 0.001 and (b) Δρρ= 0.01. The color code shows the relative concentration difference.

Fig. 7. The flow field and concentration profile in a 220-m-high fracture with a 20-m-high source in the lower left corner for T = 10−8 and a density difference of (a) Δρρ= 0.001 and (b) Δρρ= 0.01. The color code shows the relative concentration difference.

Fig. 8. Enlargement of the left corner of showing the flow field and concentration profile near the 20-m-high source on the left side for T = 10−8 and a density difference of Δρρ= 0.001.

Fig. 8. Enlargement of the left corner of Fig. 7a showing the flow field and concentration profile near the 20-m-high source on the left side for T = 10−8 and a density difference of Δρρ= 0.001.

Fig. 9. (a) Concentration and (b) flux profiles at steady state at z = 20-, 120-, and 219-m height.

Fig. 9. (a) Concentration and (b) flux profiles at steady state at z = 20-, 120-, and 219-m height.