Publication Cover
Population Studies
A Journal of Demography
Volume 75, 2021 - Issue 2
3,085
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using future age profiles to improve immigration projections

Pages 255-267 | Received 18 Dec 2019, Accepted 08 Jun 2020, Published online: 19 Aug 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1 Immigration to Norway from three origin country groups, 1975–2017

Source: Statistics Norway.

Figure 1 Immigration to Norway from three origin country groups, 1975–2017Source: Statistics Norway.

Figure 2 Age profiles of immigrants arriving in Norway by origin country group, 1990–2017

Notes: Thick lines show averages; thin grey lines show single arrival years.Source: Statistics Norway and authors’ calculations.

Figure 2 Age profiles of immigrants arriving in Norway by origin country group, 1990–2017Notes: Thick lines show averages; thin grey lines show single arrival years.Source: Statistics Norway and authors’ calculations.

Figure 3 Classification of immigrants’ arrival ages in Norway and average age profiles for immigrants arriving 1990–2017, by origin country group

Source: As for .

Figure 3 Classification of immigrants’ arrival ages in Norway and average age profiles for immigrants arriving 1990–2017, by origin country groupSource: As for Figure 2.

Figure 4 Share of population in different age groups, estimated and projected by the WPP 2019 medium variant, by country group, 1975–2100

Source: World Population Projections and authors’ calculations.

Figure 4 Share of population in different age groups, estimated and projected by the WPP 2019 medium variant, by country group, 1975–2100Source: World Population Projections and authors’ calculations.

Table 1 Projection methods for emigration rates used in this study

Figure 5 Immigration to Norway from three origin country groups, registered 1990–2017 and projected 2018–2100 by seven different methods, aggregated and disaggregated by age

Notes: The line shadings indicate the seven different methods used. Projections using disaggregated age groups in origin regions are shown by dotted/dashed lines and those with no age disaggregation are shown by solid lines. Source: As for .

Figure 5 Immigration to Norway from three origin country groups, registered 1990–2017 and projected 2018–2100 by seven different methods, aggregated and disaggregated by ageNotes: The line shadings indicate the seven different methods used. Projections using disaggregated age groups in origin regions are shown by dotted/dashed lines and those with no age disaggregation are shown by solid lines. Source: As for Figure 2.

Figure 6 Difference in annual immigration to Norway, 2018–2100, if projection method disaggregates by age (for sum of the three origin country groups)

Source: Authors’ calculations.

Figure 6 Difference in annual immigration to Norway, 2018–2100, if projection method disaggregates by age (for sum of the three origin country groups)Source: Authors’ calculations.

Figure 7 Differences in projected population size in Norway, 2018–2100, caused by introducing age disaggregation into immigration projections

Source: As for .

Figure 7 Differences in projected population size in Norway, 2018–2100, caused by introducing age disaggregation into immigration projectionsSource: As for Figure 6.
Supplemental material

Supplementary Material

Download PDF (1,015.7 KB)