Figures & data
Table 1. Time-matched, placebo-adjusted QTcI change from baseline (msec) for BTDS 10 and moxifloxacin on Day 6 – Study BUP1011.
Table 2. Time-matched, placebo-adjusted QTcI change from baseline (msec) for BTDS 40 and moxifloxacin on Day 13 – Study BUP1011.
Table 3. Average QTcI interval change from baseline – Study BUP1011.
Figure 2. Mean QTcI change from baseline versus time by treatment on Day 6 (FAP) -Study BUP1011.
Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.
![Figure 2. Mean QTcI change from baseline versus time by treatment on Day 6 (FAP) -Study BUP1011.Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.](/cms/asset/edabf630-cb0e-40ac-9198-6cb86f222615/ipgm_a_1270156_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Mean QTcI change from baseline versus time by treatment on Day 13: FAP – Study BUP1011.
Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.
![Figure 3. Mean QTcI change from baseline versus time by treatment on Day 13: FAP – Study BUP1011.Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.](/cms/asset/1df13aab-f12d-48d8-942d-81f2295dc80f/ipgm_a_1270156_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 4. Placebo-corrected change from baseline – estimates from the mixed-effect model for QTcI (msec) for BTDS only (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.
Table 5. Placebo-corrected change from baseline – estimates from the mixed-effect model for QTcI (msec) for BTDS with naltrexone (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.
Table 6. Placebo-corrected change from baseline – estimates from the mixed-effect model for QTcI (msec) for naltrexone alone (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.
Table 7. Placebo-corrected change from baseline – estimates from the mixed-effect model for QTcI (msec) for moxifloxacin (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.
Figure 4. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI (msec) versus time on Day 6 – buprenorphine 10 mcg/h (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.
Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.
![Figure 4. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI (msec) versus time on Day 6 – buprenorphine 10 mcg/h (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.](/cms/asset/616f3f01-27d8-42ac-b4ea-44d26f70e0c1/ipgm_a_1270156_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI (msec) versus time on Day 13 – buprenorphine 40 mcg/h (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.
Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.
![Figure 5. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI (msec) versus time on Day 13 – buprenorphine 40 mcg/h (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.](/cms/asset/552d4c80-7494-4a17-9b6d-daddd2e8afe1/ipgm_a_1270156_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI (msec) versus time on Day 17 – buprenorphine 80 mcg/h (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.
Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.
![Figure 6. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI (msec) versus time on Day 17 – buprenorphine 80 mcg/h (FAP for ECG) – Study BUP1025.Time points for ECGs were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 7, 10, 13, 18, and 23.5 hours.](/cms/asset/d19484bc-cc8d-49f0-a71c-9ea5d22e7910/ipgm_a_1270156_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. Scatter plot and regression line of mean QTcI change vs mean plasma concentration of buprenorphine (pg/mL) for BTDS treatment group – Study BUP1011.
![Figure 7. Scatter plot and regression line of mean QTcI change vs mean plasma concentration of buprenorphine (pg/mL) for BTDS treatment group – Study BUP1011.](/cms/asset/93c479c7-28c1-444f-8dff-f151c84301c5/ipgm_a_1270156_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI versus mean buprenorphine plasma concentration – estimates from the mixed-effects model regression – BTDS only (PK/PD analyses) – Study BUP1025.
The colors are only to highlight the distributions of the doses; the PK/PD model does not include dose.
![Figure 8. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI versus mean buprenorphine plasma concentration – estimates from the mixed-effects model regression – BTDS only (PK/PD analyses) – Study BUP1025.The colors are only to highlight the distributions of the doses; the PK/PD model does not include dose.](/cms/asset/0ebe0e97-59ec-47e7-9264-d370eab0c589/ipgm_a_1270156_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI versus mean buprenorphine plasma concentration – estimates from the mixed-effects model regression – BTDS with naltrexone (PK/PD analyses) – Study BUP1025.
The colors are only to highlight the distributions of the doses; the PK/PD model does not include dose.
![Figure 9. Placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcI versus mean buprenorphine plasma concentration – estimates from the mixed-effects model regression – BTDS with naltrexone (PK/PD analyses) – Study BUP1025.The colors are only to highlight the distributions of the doses; the PK/PD model does not include dose.](/cms/asset/38c3a7bc-205b-4c4b-b322-e6660dae32f3/ipgm_a_1270156_f0009_c.jpg)
Table 8. Summary of mean plasma pharmacokinetic metrics of buprenorphine (FAP) – Study BUP1025.