4,862
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical focus: Cardiovascular disease - Review

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: disease burden for patients, caregivers, and the health-care system

ORCID Icon &
Pages 140-145 | Received 27 Apr 2020, Accepted 23 Oct 2020, Published online: 27 Nov 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. Key Differences Between HFpEF and HFrEF [Citation1,Citation10]. HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; LV, left ventricle

Figure 1. Key Differences Between HFpEF and HFrEF [Citation1,Citation10]. HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; LV, left ventricle

Figure 2. Time to Death or Rehospitalization Because of HF in Patients Who Were Hospitalized for HF in the CHARM Study Stratified by EF and Prior HF Hospitalization [Citation28]. EF, ejection fraction; HF, heart failure. Figure reproduced from Bello NA, Claggett B, Desai AS, et al. Influence of previous heart failure hospitalization on cardiovascular events in patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation: Heart Failure 2014;7(4):590–595. https://www.ahajournals.org/journal/circheartfailure, with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health

Figure 2. Time to Death or Rehospitalization Because of HF in Patients Who Were Hospitalized for HF in the CHARM Study Stratified by EF and Prior HF Hospitalization [Citation28]. EF, ejection fraction; HF, heart failure. Figure reproduced from Bello NA, Claggett B, Desai AS, et al. Influence of previous heart failure hospitalization on cardiovascular events in patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. Circulation: Heart Failure 2014;7(4):590–595. https://www.ahajournals.org/journal/circheartfailure, with permission from Wolters Kluwer Health

Figure 3. The Effect of the Number of Noncardiac Comorbidities on the Risk of All-Cause Hospitalization in Patients With HFpEF. Error bars represent the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval, and the log hazard ratios are statistically significant (P<.001 based on the Cox proportional hazard model) [Citation38]. Reprinted from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology 59(11), Ather S, Chan W, Bozkurt B, et al., Impact of noncardiac comorbidities on morbidity and mortality in a predominantly male population with heart failure and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction, pg. 998–1005, Copyright 2012, with permission from Elsevier

Figure 3. The Effect of the Number of Noncardiac Comorbidities on the Risk of All-Cause Hospitalization in Patients With HFpEF. Error bars represent the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval, and the log hazard ratios are statistically significant (P<.001 based on the Cox proportional hazard model) [Citation38]. Reprinted from the Journal of the American College of Cardiology 59(11), Ather S, Chan W, Bozkurt B, et al., Impact of noncardiac comorbidities on morbidity and mortality in a predominantly male population with heart failure and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction, pg. 998–1005, Copyright 2012, with permission from Elsevier