2,618
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Paper from VICNP Ciudad Real, Spain. 2017, guest edited by Gemma Herranz

Debinding behaviour of feedstock for material extrusion additive manufacturing of zirconia

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 196-204 | Received 29 Nov 2017, Accepted 03 May 2019, Published online: 15 May 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Strain-stress (ε – σ) curves for filaments containing stainless steel (316L), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), neodymium alloy (NdFeB), strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) and yttria stabilised zirconia (YSZ) [Citation11].

Figure 1. Strain-stress (ε – σ) curves for filaments containing stainless steel (316L), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), neodymium alloy (NdFeB), strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) and yttria stabilised zirconia (YSZ) [Citation11].

Figure 2. Examples of parts build by FFF with 5 powder types: stainless steel (316L), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), neodymium alloy (NdFeB), strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) and yttria stabilised zirconia (YSZ) [Citation11].

Figure 2. Examples of parts build by FFF with 5 powder types: stainless steel (316L), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), neodymium alloy (NdFeB), strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) and yttria stabilised zirconia (YSZ) [Citation11].

Figure 3. (a) Mass loss of soluble binder component for feedstocks with stainless steel (316L), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), neodymium alloy (NdFeB), strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) and yttria stabilised zirconia (YSZ); (b) specimens after debinding in cyclohexane at 60°C at different times [Citation11].

Figure 3. (a) Mass loss of soluble binder component for feedstocks with stainless steel (316L), titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V), neodymium alloy (NdFeB), strontium ferrite (SrFe12O19) and yttria stabilised zirconia (YSZ); (b) specimens after debinding in cyclohexane at 60°C at different times [Citation11].

Table 1. Parameters employed for the production of specimens by compression moulding.

Figure 4. Defects observed in solvent debound specimens at different times and temperatures for feedstock A.

Figure 4. Defects observed in solvent debound specimens at different times and temperatures for feedstock A.

Figure 5. (a) Loss of soluble binder and (b) length change over time at different temperatures for feedstock A.

Figure 5. (a) Loss of soluble binder and (b) length change over time at different temperatures for feedstock A.

Figure 6. Defects observed in solvent debound specimens for feedstocks without (feedstock A) and with SA (feedstock B).

Figure 6. Defects observed in solvent debound specimens for feedstocks without (feedstock A) and with SA (feedstock B).

Figure 7. (a) Loss of soluble binder and (b) length change over time at 60°C for feedstocks without (feedstock A) and with SA (feedstock B).

Figure 7. (a) Loss of soluble binder and (b) length change over time at 60°C for feedstocks without (feedstock A) and with SA (feedstock B).

Figure 8. Defects observed in solvent debound specimens after debinding in different solvents at 1, 3.5 and 6 h.

Figure 8. Defects observed in solvent debound specimens after debinding in different solvents at 1, 3.5 and 6 h.

Figure 9. (a) Mass loss of soluble binder and (b) length change over time in different solvents.

Figure 9. (a) Mass loss of soluble binder and (b) length change over time in different solvents.