Figures & data
Table 1. Demographic details of the patients included in the study.
Figure 1. Representative images from differentiated mesenchymal stem cells. A–D: bone marrow mesenchymal cells, BMSCs and E–H: adipose derived mesenchymal cells, ADSCs. Panel B and F are stained with Red Oil for adipocyte identification. Panel C and G are stained with Alcian Blue for chondrocyte identification. Panel D and H are stained with Alizarian Red for osteoblast identification.
![Figure 1. Representative images from differentiated mesenchymal stem cells. A–D: bone marrow mesenchymal cells, BMSCs and E–H: adipose derived mesenchymal cells, ADSCs. Panel B and F are stained with Red Oil for adipocyte identification. Panel C and G are stained with Alcian Blue for chondrocyte identification. Panel D and H are stained with Alizarian Red for osteoblast identification.](/cms/asset/6abf7d81-8947-4e91-a422-d35549af46c0/iclb_a_1741023_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Analysis of positive and negative cell surface antigen expression in expansions of bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells, BMSCs (top row) and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells, ADSCs (bottom row). Representative plots from one study participant. Percentage (%) of positive cells are shown in each peak for markers CD105, CD73, CD90 and for the cells lacking the negative cocktail containing CD34, CD11b, CD19, CD45, HLA-DR. Gating was performed using isotype control and unstained cells (data not shown).
![Figure 2. Analysis of positive and negative cell surface antigen expression in expansions of bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells, BMSCs (top row) and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells, ADSCs (bottom row). Representative plots from one study participant. Percentage (%) of positive cells are shown in each peak for markers CD105, CD73, CD90 and for the cells lacking the negative cocktail containing CD34, CD11b, CD19, CD45, HLA-DR. Gating was performed using isotype control and unstained cells (data not shown).](/cms/asset/dcb42349-8305-4714-bc20-7a7411743c6a/iclb_a_1741023_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Time to confluency (days) versus yield (total cell number) for passage 1 and 2, paired samples from donor 1 to 6. Top diagram, A: shows growth and yield for bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and bottom diagram, B: adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs). On average, 80% confluency was reached in 13 ± 4 days (ADSCs) and 24 ± 6 days (BMSCs), passage 1, and 11 ± 2 days (ADSCs) and 17 ± 5 days (BMSCs), passage 2. After the second passage, the yield was numerically higher from ADSCs compared with BMSCs, although, this did not reach significance.
![Figure 3. Time to confluency (days) versus yield (total cell number) for passage 1 and 2, paired samples from donor 1 to 6. Top diagram, A: shows growth and yield for bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and bottom diagram, B: adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs). On average, 80% confluency was reached in 13 ± 4 days (ADSCs) and 24 ± 6 days (BMSCs), passage 1, and 11 ± 2 days (ADSCs) and 17 ± 5 days (BMSCs), passage 2. After the second passage, the yield was numerically higher from ADSCs compared with BMSCs, although, this did not reach significance.](/cms/asset/ac5aa8dc-001c-4d6b-8584-59f97ac9bbf8/iclb_a_1741023_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Gene expression of target genes in MSCs from different tissues and/or MSCs exposed to different oxygen concentration. Data expressed as box plots; median values, standard deviations and range for adipose tissue derived stem cells (ADSCs) and bone marrow derived stem cells (BMSCs) cultured for 6, 24 and 48 h in 5% O2 and 1% O2. Significant differences between groups are defined as p value below .001 and marked with *. ADSCs expressed significantly higher levels of angiopoetin1 (Angpt1), leukemia inhibition factor (LIF) and tumor growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) compared to BMSC, both when cultured in 5% O2, and when cultured in 1% O2 at all examined time points. The expression of Angpt1 increased over time in ADSCs 1% O2, and was after 48 h significantly higher compared to ADSCs 1% O2 cultured for 6 h, and compared to ADSCs 5% O2. The expression of LIF increased over time in ADSCs but not in BMSCs, and was significantly higher after 48 h compared to 6 h. The expression of TGF-β1 increased in BMSCs 1% O2 and was significantly upregulated after 48 h compared to 6 h. Due to the increased expression of TGF-β1 in BMSCs 1% O2, expression was significantly higher after 48 h in BMSCs 1% O2 compared to BMSCs 5% O2. In ADSCs, the expression also increased but the increase did not reach significance. However, after 48 h, the expression of TGF-β1 was significantly higher in ADSCs 1% O2 compared to ADSCs 5% O2.
![Figure 4. Gene expression of target genes in MSCs from different tissues and/or MSCs exposed to different oxygen concentration. Data expressed as box plots; median values, standard deviations and range for adipose tissue derived stem cells (ADSCs) and bone marrow derived stem cells (BMSCs) cultured for 6, 24 and 48 h in 5% O2 and 1% O2. Significant differences between groups are defined as p value below .001 and marked with *. ADSCs expressed significantly higher levels of angiopoetin1 (Angpt1), leukemia inhibition factor (LIF) and tumor growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) compared to BMSC, both when cultured in 5% O2, and when cultured in 1% O2 at all examined time points. The expression of Angpt1 increased over time in ADSCs 1% O2, and was after 48 h significantly higher compared to ADSCs 1% O2 cultured for 6 h, and compared to ADSCs 5% O2. The expression of LIF increased over time in ADSCs but not in BMSCs, and was significantly higher after 48 h compared to 6 h. The expression of TGF-β1 increased in BMSCs 1% O2 and was significantly upregulated after 48 h compared to 6 h. Due to the increased expression of TGF-β1 in BMSCs 1% O2, expression was significantly higher after 48 h in BMSCs 1% O2 compared to BMSCs 5% O2. In ADSCs, the expression also increased but the increase did not reach significance. However, after 48 h, the expression of TGF-β1 was significantly higher in ADSCs 1% O2 compared to ADSCs 5% O2.](/cms/asset/9b088969-33b7-4080-a056-f78998512a3a/iclb_a_1741023_f0004_b.jpg)