2,065
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reference intervals for 12 clinical laboratory tests in a Danish population: The Lolland-Falster Health Study

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 104-111 | Received 01 Jul 2020, Accepted 13 Dec 2020, Published online: 10 Jan 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of participants in Lolland-Falster Health Study aged 18 + years: Determinants, 2016–2019.

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of reference population.

Table 3. Lower and upper limits for reference intervals in apparently healthy males and females.

Figure 1. Relative change and 90% confidence intervals of LOFUS reference values compared to NORIP values, lower limit. Relative change is computed as (XLOFUS - XNORIP)/XNORIP, and similarly for confidence limits. Black dots denote relative changes whose confidence interval overlaps zero (dashed line).

Figure 1. Relative change and 90% confidence intervals of LOFUS reference values compared to NORIP values, lower limit. Relative change is computed as (XLOFUS - XNORIP)/XNORIP, and similarly for confidence limits. Black dots denote relative changes whose confidence interval overlaps zero (dashed line).

Figure 2. Relative change and 90% confidence intervals of LOFUS reference values compared to NORIP values, upper limit. Relative change is computed as (XLOFUS - XNORIP)/XNORIP, and similarly for confidence limits. Black dots denote relative changes whose confidence interval overlaps zero (dashed line).

Figure 2. Relative change and 90% confidence intervals of LOFUS reference values compared to NORIP values, upper limit. Relative change is computed as (XLOFUS - XNORIP)/XNORIP, and similarly for confidence limits. Black dots denote relative changes whose confidence interval overlaps zero (dashed line).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (34.2 KB)

Data availability statement

Data from the study can be made available via Region Zealand following the Danish Data Protection Regulation.