1,170
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Colonoscopic surveillance – a cost-effective method to prevent hereditary and familial colorectal cancer

, &
Pages 1002-1007 | Received 19 Mar 2017, Accepted 04 May 2017, Published online: 06 Jun 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Classification of family history for definition of hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC) and familial colorectal cancer (FCRC).

Figure 1. Model for cost–utility analysis comparing colonoscopic surveillance vs. non-surveillance and calculations of incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Figure 1. Model for cost–utility analysis comparing colonoscopic surveillance vs. non-surveillance and calculations of incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Figure 2. Input data varied in the sensitivity analysis.

Figure 2. Input data varied in the sensitivity analysis.

Table 2. Baseline data and outcome of surveillance for the study cohort.

Table 3. Estimations on expected cases of CRC in the study cohort without surveillance.

Table 4. Calculations on differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), surveillance vs. non-surveillance.

Table 5. Costs for the health care sector and loss of production, surveillance vs. non-surveillance.

Figure 3. Comparison of incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for different cancer preventive or screening health care interventions and threshold for low-cost interventions according to the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (SNBHW).

Figure 3. Comparison of incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for different cancer preventive or screening health care interventions and threshold for low-cost interventions according to the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (SNBHW).
Supplemental material

Supplementary_tables.pdf

Download PDF (84.5 KB)