Analyses of the relationship between a ‘number of reflux episodes’ exceeding 70 and the pH index in neurologically impaired children by evaluating esophageal combined pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance measurements

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the characteristics associated with a number of reflux episodes (NoRE) of 70 by comparing the clinical and multichannel intraluminal impedance pH measurements (pH/MII) and pH index (pHI) in neurologically impaired (NI) children.

Patients and methods: NI children (1–16 years of age) in whom pH/MII had been measured for GERD study were enrolled in this study. All children were divided into NoRE >70 or ≤70 and pHI >4.0 or ≤4.0, >5.0 or ≤5.0 or >7.0 or ≤7.0. In addition, the NI children with pHI >4.0, >5.0 and >7.0 were subdivided into NoRE >70 and ≤70 groups. The clinical and pH/MII measurements were compared between each of the two groups. The cutoff values of pHI and baseline impedance (BI) (Z6) were calculated to discriminate NoRE >70 and ≤70.

Results: A total of 61 NI children were enrolled in this study. There was a significant difference in the acid-related parameters, the NoRE (nonacid) and BI between NoRE >70 and ≤70, acid-related parameters and BI between pHI >4.0 and ≤4.0, >5.0 and ≤5.0 and >7.0 and ≤7.0 groups. Furthermore, a significant difference was still observed in the BI between NoRE >70 and ≤70 groups among patients with pHI >4.0, >5.0 or >7.0. The cutoff values of pHI and BI (Z6) for discriminating NoRE >70 and ≤70 were 9.2 and 1049Ω, respectively.

Conclusion: The present study indicates that NoRE 70 corresponds to GERD in which patients suffer severe acid exposure with pH of around 9% and esophageal mucosal damage with low BI value in NI children.

Keywords:

• Multichannel intraluminal impedance measurements
• gastroesophageal reflux
• neurologically impaired children
• high number of reflux episodes
• pH index
• baseline impedance

Disclosure statement

Suguru Fukahori designed the research study, analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Minoru Yagi & Yoshiaki Tanaka designed the research study and wrote the paper; Shinji Ishii & Kimio Asagiri analyzed the data; Nobuyuki Saikusa, Naoki Hashizume, Motomu Yoshida, Daisuke Masui, Saki Sakamoto, Naruki Higashidate & Hirotomo Nakahara performed the research.

The authors have no competing interests.