Figures & data
Table 1. Demographics of the study group.
Figure 1. Diagnostic performance of CA 19-9, IL.17E, B7.1 and DR6 for discrimination of pancreatic cancer and healthy controls.
![Figure 1. Diagnostic performance of CA 19-9, IL.17E, B7.1 and DR6 for discrimination of pancreatic cancer and healthy controls.](/cms/asset/c922d605-ddcc-4029-876b-21cab71ff514/igas_a_1532020_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 2. Best models for pancreatic cancer versus healthy.
Figure 2. Diagnostic performance of CA 19-9, Eotaxin.2, CD163 and BMP.3b for discrimination of IPMN and healthy controls.
![Figure 2. Diagnostic performance of CA 19-9, Eotaxin.2, CD163 and BMP.3b for discrimination of IPMN and healthy controls.](/cms/asset/b184f2e8-9273-4e14-b00b-4d7793fcc140/igas_a_1532020_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 3. Best models for IPMN versus healthy.
Figure 4. Diagnostic performance of CA 19-9, IL.17E, B7.1 and IL.12RBeta2 for discrimination of pancreatic cancer and IPMN.
![Figure 4. Diagnostic performance of CA 19-9, IL.17E, B7.1 and IL.12RBeta2 for discrimination of pancreatic cancer and IPMN.](/cms/asset/bff8fc3c-8492-4b71-a8b1-1a72889b2734/igas_a_1532020_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 4. Best models for pancreatic cancer versus IPMN.