2,803
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Environment

Effects of peat moss and sawdust compost applications on N2O emission and N leaching in blueberry cultivating soils

, , &
Pages 348-360 | Received 12 Jun 2010, Accepted 21 Mar 2011, Published online: 25 May 2011

Figures & data

Table 1 Selected chemical and physical properties of Tateyama soil (Cambisol), peat moss (PM), and sawdust (SD) compost served for the cultivation experiment and soils amended with PM and SD compost plus ferrous sulfate. The values for PM and SD compost amended soils were measured before planting blueberry seedlings in April 2008

Table 2 Total dry weight (shoot and root) of blueberry plants, annual blueberry yields, and total nitrogen (N) uptake of blueberry plant over the experimental period in each treatment

Figure 1 Soil pH changes during the experimental period as affected by organic amendments. AS, ammonium sulfate applied alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate applied with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate applied with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. Bars show least significant difference (LSD) (α = 0.05). Vertical arrows show the timing of nitrogen fertilizer applications.

Figure 1 Soil pH changes during the experimental period as affected by organic amendments. AS, ammonium sulfate applied alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate applied with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate applied with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. Bars show least significant difference (LSD) (α = 0.05). Vertical arrows show the timing of nitrogen fertilizer applications.

Figure 2 Changes in ammonium ion () (a) and nitrate ion () (b) concentrations in soils during the experimental period. AS, ammonium sulfate applied alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate applied with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate applied with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. Bars show least significant difference (LSD) (α = 0.05). Vertical arrows show the timing of nitrogen fertilizer applications.

Figure 2 Changes in ammonium ion () (a) and nitrate ion () (b) concentrations in soils during the experimental period. AS, ammonium sulfate applied alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate applied with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate applied with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. Bars show least significant difference (LSD) (α = 0.05). Vertical arrows show the timing of nitrogen fertilizer applications.

Figure 3 Changes in daily nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes (a), precipitation (b), and soil temperature at 5-cm depth (c) in 2008 and 2009. AS, ammonium sulfate applied alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate applied with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate applied with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. Bars show least significant difference (LSD) (α = 0.05). Vertical arrows show the timing of nitrogen fertilizer applications.

Figure 3 Changes in daily nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes (a), precipitation (b), and soil temperature at 5-cm depth (c) in 2008 and 2009. AS, ammonium sulfate applied alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate applied with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate applied with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. Bars show least significant difference (LSD) (α = 0.05). Vertical arrows show the timing of nitrogen fertilizer applications.

Table 3 Total mineral nitrogen (N) applied to blueberry cultivating soils, cumulative N loss as emitted nitrous oxide (N2O), and emission factors of N2O throughout the experimental period in each treatment

Figure 4 Cumulative nitrogen (N) losses as ammonium ion () and nitrate ion () in leachates in 2008 (a) and 2009 (b). AS, ammonium sulfate applied alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate applied with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate applied with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. Vertical arrows show the timing of nitrogen fertilizer applications.

Figure 4 Cumulative nitrogen (N) losses as ammonium ion () and nitrate ion () in leachates in 2008 (a) and 2009 (b). AS, ammonium sulfate applied alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate applied with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate applied with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. Vertical arrows show the timing of nitrogen fertilizer applications.

Figure 5 Distribution of mineral nitrogen (N) applied as ammonium sulfate after two-year cultivation of blueberry. AS, ammonium sulfate alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. N2O, nitrous oxide; , ammonium ion; , nitrate ion.

Figure 5 Distribution of mineral nitrogen (N) applied as ammonium sulfate after two-year cultivation of blueberry. AS, ammonium sulfate alone; AS + PM, ammonium sulfate with peat moss; AS + SD, ammonium sulfate with sawdust compost and ferrous sulfate. N2O, nitrous oxide; , ammonium ion; , nitrate ion.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.