855
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Environment

Effect of dairy manure type on the carbon balance of mowed grassland in Nasu, Japan: comparison between manure slurry plus synthetic fertilizer plots and farmyard manure plus synthetic fertilizer plots

&
Pages 736-746 | Received 21 Dec 2014, Accepted 19 Apr 2015, Published online: 13 May 2015

Figures & data

Table 1 Manure application rates and their chemical and physical properties

Figure 1 Temporal changes in (a) CO2 flux, (b) temperature at a depth of 5 cm below the soil surface. Values are means ± SEM (n = 3). Vertical lines indicate fertilizer applications.

Figure 1 Temporal changes in (a) CO2 flux, (b) temperature at a depth of 5 cm below the soil surface. Values are means ± SEM (n = 3). Vertical lines indicate fertilizer applications.

Table 2 Mineral nitrogen supplied from synthetic fertilizer, slurry, and FYM

Table 3 CO2 emission from grassland, Rs and Rm

Figure 2 (a) Manure input for each crop and (b) manure that remained on 21 March 2010. FYM, farmyard manure; Rm, manure decomposition.

Figure 2 (a) Manure input for each crop and (b) manure that remained on 21 March 2010. FYM, farmyard manure; Rm, manure decomposition.

Figure 3 Dry matter yields (Scheffé’s test). FYM, farmyard manure.

Figure 3 Dry matter yields (Scheffé’s test). FYM, farmyard manure.

Figure 4 (a) Plant residue inputs and (b) amount of plant residues remaining until the end of the study (21 March 2010). FYM, farmyard manure. Rp, decomposition of plant residue.

Figure 4 (a) Plant residue inputs and (b) amount of plant residues remaining until the end of the study (21 March 2010). FYM, farmyard manure. Rp, decomposition of plant residue.

Figure 5 Proportion of the plant-residue mass in the litter bags remaining at various times during the study period. Values are means ± SEM (= 5). Arrows represent the harvest times for the1st to 4th crops.

Figure 5 Proportion of the plant-residue mass in the litter bags remaining at various times during the study period. Values are means ± SEM (n = 5). Arrows represent the harvest times for the1st to 4th crops.

Figure 6 Carbon contents in the roots and stubble. Values are means ± SEM (= 3). FYM, farmyard manure.

Figure 6 Carbon contents in the roots and stubble. Values are means ± SEM (n = 3). FYM, farmyard manure.

Figure 7 (a) Soil inputs and outputs of C to the soil and (b) net SOC balance. FYM, farmyard manure; Rp, decomposition of plant residues; Rm, decomposition of manure; Rs, decomposition of soil organic matter; SOC, soil organic carbon.

Figure 7 (a) Soil inputs and outputs of C to the soil and (b) net SOC balance. FYM, farmyard manure; Rp, decomposition of plant residues; Rm, decomposition of manure; Rs, decomposition of soil organic matter; SOC, soil organic carbon.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.