1,122
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Plant nutrition

Effects of deep placement of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on soybean growth and yield under sulfur deficiency

, , , ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 259-266 | Received 20 Dec 2018, Accepted 02 May 2019, Published online: 15 May 2019

Figures & data

Table 1. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on SPAD values in leaves at the flowering stage

Figure 1. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on shoot biomass at the developing stage. Shoot dry weights were determined 40 days after sowing. Means ± standard deviations of four biological replicates are shown. The asterisk indicates a significant difference using a Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

Figure 1. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on shoot biomass at the developing stage. Shoot dry weights were determined 40 days after sowing. Means ± standard deviations of four biological replicates are shown. The asterisk indicates a significant difference using a Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

Figure 2. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on soybean seed yield and yield components at the harvest stage. Mature dry seeds were harvested, and seed dry weight per plant (a), hundred-seed weight (b), seed number per pod (c), and pod number per plant (d) were determined. Means ± standard deviations of four biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate significant differences using a Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

Figure 2. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on soybean seed yield and yield components at the harvest stage. Mature dry seeds were harvested, and seed dry weight per plant (a), hundred-seed weight (b), seed number per pod (c), and pod number per plant (d) were determined. Means ± standard deviations of four biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate significant differences using a Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

Figure 3. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on N concentrations and content in shoots of soybean at developing stage and in seeds at harvest stage. N concentration in shoots (a) and N content in shoots per plant (b) were determined 40 days after sowing, and N concentration in mature dry seeds (c) and N content in mature dry seeds per plant (d) were determined at the harvest stage. Means ± standard deviations of four biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate significant differences using a Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

Figure 3. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on N concentrations and content in shoots of soybean at developing stage and in seeds at harvest stage. N concentration in shoots (a) and N content in shoots per plant (b) were determined 40 days after sowing, and N concentration in mature dry seeds (c) and N content in mature dry seeds per plant (d) were determined at the harvest stage. Means ± standard deviations of four biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate significant differences using a Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

Figure 4. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on S concentrations and content in soybean shoots at the developing stage and in seeds at the harvest stage. S concentration in shoots (a) and the S content in shoots per plant (b) were determined at 40 days after sowing, and S concentration in mature dry seeds (c) and the S content in mature dry seeds per plant (d) were determined at the harvest stage. Means ± standard deviations of four biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate significant differences using a Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

Figure 4. Effects of S supply and deep placement of coated urea on S concentrations and content in soybean shoots at the developing stage and in seeds at the harvest stage. S concentration in shoots (a) and the S content in shoots per plant (b) were determined at 40 days after sowing, and S concentration in mature dry seeds (c) and the S content in mature dry seeds per plant (d) were determined at the harvest stage. Means ± standard deviations of four biological replicates are shown. Asterisks indicate significant differences using a Student’s t-test (P < 0.05)

Table 2. Ureide, amide, and nitrate concentration and relative ureide-N content in xylem sap

Supplemental material

Supplemental_Table_S1.pdf

Download PDF (138.2 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.