935
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Environment

Methane oxidation potential of the arctic wetland soils of a taiga-tundra ecotone in northeastern Siberia

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 645-652 | Received 31 Jan 2020, Accepted 18 Jun 2020, Published online: 13 Jul 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Summary of samples used and experimental setup

Figure 1. Temporal change of methane concentration in the headspace of the microcosms with soil samples collected from the different vegetation types in 2012 (a, moss; b; sedge; c, moss in the mound) treated with inorganic nutrient and black carbon. Bars indicate the standard error (n = 3)

Figure 1. Temporal change of methane concentration in the headspace of the microcosms with soil samples collected from the different vegetation types in 2012 (a, moss; b; sedge; c, moss in the mound) treated with inorganic nutrient and black carbon. Bars indicate the standard error (n = 3)

Table 2. Estimated potential methane oxidation rate of soil samples from the wetlands of northeastern Siberia (average ± std error, n = 3)

Figure 2. Methane oxidation by the different depth layers of moss- and sedge- dominated soils in 2013 (a and b) and 2015 (c and d). Bars indicate the standard error (n = 3)

Figure 2. Methane oxidation by the different depth layers of moss- and sedge- dominated soils in 2013 (a and b) and 2015 (c and d). Bars indicate the standard error (n = 3)

Figure 3. Vertical profile of dissolved oxygen in pore water of the wetland soils. Three independent measurements for sedge- and moss-dominated wetlands were done at the study site in 2014

Figure 3. Vertical profile of dissolved oxygen in pore water of the wetland soils. Three independent measurements for sedge- and moss-dominated wetlands were done at the study site in 2014

Figure 4. Effect of incubation temperature on methane oxidation by (a) moss and (b) sedge-dominated peat samples and (c) the temperature dependence of the methane oxidation rate (0–10 cm) (2014). Bars indicate the standard error (n = 3). Data marked with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, as determined by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test)

Figure 4. Effect of incubation temperature on methane oxidation by (a) moss and (b) sedge-dominated peat samples and (c) the temperature dependence of the methane oxidation rate (0–10 cm) (2014). Bars indicate the standard error (n = 3). Data marked with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05, as determined by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test)

Figure 5. Temperature coefficient (Q10) of methane oxidation estimated between different temperature ranges

Figure 5. Temperature coefficient (Q10) of methane oxidation estimated between different temperature ranges

Figure 6. Effect of CH2F2 on methane flux from wetland estimated by the closed chamber method. Methane flux 1, 1st measurement without CH2F2; Methane flux 2, 2nd measurement after injection with or without CH2F2.

Figure 6. Effect of CH2F2 on methane flux from wetland estimated by the closed chamber method. Methane flux 1, 1st measurement without CH2F2; Methane flux 2, 2nd measurement after injection with or without CH2F2.
Supplemental material

Fig._S3_soil__bulk_density.pdf

Download PDF (122 KB)

SSPN_Fig._S2.pdf

Download PDF (93.3 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.