Figures & data
Table 1. Type and timing of the management practices applied for the two alfalfa termination methods
Table 2. Mean data and results of repeated measures ANOVA for the soil parameters following the Tillage and No tillage plus herbicide alfalfa termination methods over the study period
Figure 1. Seasonal variations as days after alfalfa termination (day 0) for the soil temperature (ST) and water-filled pore space (WFPS) at 0.10 m depth (a), and of the soil nitrous oxide (N2O, b), methane (CH4,c) and carbon dioxide (CO2, d) fluxes. Data are means ±standard error (n = 3). *, P < 0.05, alfalfa termination by Tillage versus No tillage plus herbicide.
![Figure 1. Seasonal variations as days after alfalfa termination (day 0) for the soil temperature (ST) and water-filled pore space (WFPS) at 0.10 m depth (a), and of the soil nitrous oxide (N2O, b), methane (CH4,c) and carbon dioxide (CO2, d) fluxes. Data are means ±standard error (n = 3). *, P < 0.05, alfalfa termination by Tillage versus No tillage plus herbicide.](/cms/asset/95753448-12d7-4beb-a1a6-8c44073afc19/tssp_a_1983869_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Soil total greenhouse gas (N2O + CH4 + CO2) emissions over the 71-day study period following alfalfa termination by Tillage and by No tillage plus herbicide. Inset: The weight of each gas compared to the total soil greenhouse gas emissions following each alfalfa termination method. Positive values represent losses; negative values represent uptake. Data are means ±standard error (n = 3). *, P < 0.05, alfalfa termination by Tillage versus
![Figure 2. Soil total greenhouse gas (N2O + CH4 + CO2) emissions over the 71-day study period following alfalfa termination by Tillage and by No tillage plus herbicide. Inset: The weight of each gas compared to the total soil greenhouse gas emissions following each alfalfa termination method. Positive values represent losses; negative values represent uptake. Data are means ±standard error (n = 3). *, P < 0.05, alfalfa termination by Tillage versus](/cms/asset/7faa4c08-211f-41a5-b2cd-69702416c3e0/tssp_a_1983869_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Relationships between the variations in soil GHG emissions (N2O, CH4, CO2) and soil temperature at 0.1 m depth (a) and soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) at 0.1 m depth (b), following the alfalfa termination by Tillage (dashed line, open circles) and by No tillage plus herbicide (continuous line, closed circles). Data are means ±standard error (n = 3). *, P < 0.05.
![Figure 3. Relationships between the variations in soil GHG emissions (N2O, CH4, CO2) and soil temperature at 0.1 m depth (a) and soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) at 0.1 m depth (b), following the alfalfa termination by Tillage (dashed line, open circles) and by No tillage plus herbicide (continuous line, closed circles). Data are means ±standard error (n = 3). *, P < 0.05.](/cms/asset/f028a59f-e4b0-42f2-9ab4-26bae6b2c4e6/tssp_a_1983869_f0003_b.gif)