1,770
Views
54
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Toward a Model of Transfer as Sense-Making

&
Pages 184-207 | Published online: 24 Jun 2013
 

Abstract

We propose a novel theoretical framework for knowledge transfer that consists of constructing a representation of context, generating a solution, and evaluating whether the solution makes sense given that context. Sense-making and satisficing processes determine when the transfer cycle begins and ends, and the classical mechanisms of transfer (identical rules, analogy, knowledge compilation, and constraint violation) are triggered under different representations of context. We use this framework to interpret student transfer behaviors with examples from the literature in the domains of physics and mathematics. We view this framework as a research tool to explore the dynamic nature and complexity of transfer by highlighting critical features and issues that a complete model of transfer must address. We describe how the framework relates to the classical and recent alternative approaches to understanding transfer and discuss the implications for theory development and instruction.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Grant SBE0354420 from the National Science Foundation, Pittsburgh Science of Learning Center (http://www.learnlab.org) and Grant R305B070085 from the Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. No endorsement should be inferred. We thank Vincent Aleven, David T. Brookes, Clark Chinn, Stellan Ohlsson, James Greeno, Sarah Nokes-Malach, members of Cognitive Science Learning Laboratory, and three anonymous reviewers for their many helpful comments and suggestions on the paper.

Notes

In the knowledge compilation section, we describe the complementary computational mechanism in Anderson's ACT-R cognitive architecture that can account for declarative-to-procedural transfer (Anderson & Lebiere, Citation1998).

This final evaluation to determine if sense-making has been achieved can be a careful, conscientious effort encompassing the entire process or a tacit evaluation to determine if things feel OK and there are no obvious errors or contradictions.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 395.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.