Acknowledgements
I thank Marcella Araujo and Andrea Rota for reading and providing comments on the text. I take full responsibility for what is written.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Correction Statement
This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.
Notes
1 Following Lefebvre (Citation2008), the virtual object of thought is a possible object; although not empirically verifiable, it is not fictitious.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Rodrigo Toniol
Rodrigo Toniol is Professor at the Department of Cultural Anthropology and the Postgraduate Program in Sociology and Anthropology at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Researcher at CNPq. Former president of the Association of Social Sciences of Religion in Latin America.