Europeanization and Euroscepticism: Experiences from Poland and the Czech Republic

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Notes

1. Lapid, “Cultures Ship.”

2. Schöpflin, Nations, Identity, Power.

3. Drulák, National and European Identities in EU Enlargement, 11.

4. Anderson, Imagined Communities.

5. Jiri Bordsky, in Drulák, National and European Identities in EU Enlargement, 21.

6. In Drulák, National and European Identities in EU Enlargement.

7. Kiss, Hungarians about their Nation, Others, and Europe, referring to de Rosa, “Reality Changes Faster than Research.”

8. Laffan, “Managing Europe from Home.”

9. Radielli, “Whither Europeanization?”

10. Gwiazda, “Europeanisation in Candidate Countries and Eastern Europe,” 13.

11. Grote, “Delimiting Europeanization.”

12. Kelstrup, “Small States and European Integration,” in Tiikainen and Petersen, Small States and European Integration, 148.

13. Rupnik, “Europe Moves Eastward.”

14. Kelstrup, “Small States and European Integration,” in Tiikainen and Petersen, Small States and European Integration, 154.

15. Rupnik, “Europe Moves Eastward.”

16. Gyarfasova, “From Defence against the ‘Others’ to the Formation of its Own Interests,” in Drulák, National and European Identities in EU Enlargement, 55.

17. Lesaar, “Simpler Idem?,” in Drulák, National and European Identities in EU Enlargement, 194.

18. Aleks Szczerbiak and Paul Taggart, “Theorizing Party-Based Euroscepticism,” 6–7.

19. Taggart and Szczerbiak, Parties, Positions and Europe, 9–10.

20. Ibid.

21. Ibid., 10.

22. This classification is inspired by the classification made by Taggart and Szczerbiak, Parties and Europe: Euroscepticism, 10–11.

23. Szczerbiak and Taggart, “Theorising Party-Based Euroscepticism.”

24. Daskalov, The Making of a Nation in the Balkans.

25. Kiss, Hungarians about their Nation, Others, and Europe.

26. “Radio Netherlands,” 14 December 2001, <www.rnw.nl>.

27. BBC News, 15 December 2003, <www.bbc.co.uk>.

28. “Rzeczpospolita silna jak nigdy.”

29. Gmyz, “Praktyczna pani, Danuta Hübner bedzie najlepszym komisarzym Unii Europ.”

30. These questions are discussed in “Trójkat berlinski?”

31. Olechowski, “Oglad I poglad, Nadal sami?”

32. “European Elections Important for Poland.”

33. Starucha, “Z zachodnieogo na nasze.”

34. An overview of the EU debate is available in Kim (2004).

35. Kim, “Poland Continues to Muse over the EU Constitution Impasse.”

36. “Czechs Still Have Certain Fears.”

37. Drulák, National and European Identities in EU Enlargement, 26.

38. Hanley, “Czechs Seek Yet Another Model.”

39. Hanley (2002).

40. Václav Havel, in Drulák, National and European Identities in EU Enlargement, 188–89.

41. <www.ceskenoviny.cz,> 15 March 2002, “Diversity is EU's Asset, the Future Lies in Federation.”

42. <www.ceskenoviny.cz,> 28 September 2004, “Spidla Favours EU Social Model, but Also for Reforms.”

43. Stated, for example, in Kavan's speech at the European Policy Center, 22 February 2002, <www.Euroskeop.cz,> 30 April 2002, “The Future Functioning of the European Union.”

44. <www.ceskenoviny.cz,> 21 July 2003, “Klaus Describes Adoption of the Euro as ‘unreasonable.’”

45. <www.rferl.org/newsline,> 11 February 2004.

46. <www.ceskenoviny.cz,> 28 September 2004, “Klaus Says that Iraq Shows there …” and “Klaus Criticises European Constitution …”

47. Hanley (2002).

48. Zahradil, “EU Enlargement will Help Prevent its Further Unification.”

49. Ibid.

50. Spritzer, “Czech MEPs Lead Euroskeptic Faction.”

51. “Klaus–Svoboda Meeting.”

52. “Klaus na Ukrajine.”

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Søren Riishøj

Søren Jacob Riishøj, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science and Public Management, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Email: [email protected]