Abstract
In 1956, a prominent faction within the leadership of Soviet Latvia, the Latvian national communists, launched two ambitious initiatives designed to redress perceived Stalinist Russification polices – a language law and residency restrictions. This article examines and evaluates these two policies and asks if they were part of a “Latvianization” program that deliberately targeted Russians for denial of residency permits and required Russians to gain Latvian-language competency within a two-year timeframe or face the threat of dismissal. In an effort to restore the primacy of the Latvian language, the national communists created a law enforcing knowledge of Latvian and Russian for Communist Party and government functionaries and service sector personnel. Using the Soviet legal system, the national communists also attempted to halt the influx of predominantly Slavic immigration to the Latvian capital, Riga. By instituting passport restrictions on settling in the city, the national communists sought to limit Slavic migration in order to maintain Riga’s Latvian character and reduce pressure on the city’s housing supply and municipal services. Existing studies deem passport restrictions in other Soviet cities a failure. The author argues, however, that the national communists’ scheme was generally successful, dramatically curbing migration to Riga during its operation.
ORCID
Michael Loader http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2307-5035
Notes
1. Latvijas Valsts arhīvs – Partija arhīvs hereafter LVA-PA, fonds 101, apraksts 19, lieta 30, lapa 3–5 – f. 101, apr. 19, l. 30, lp. 3–5.
2. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 30, lp. 4.
3. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 59, lp. 6–10.
4. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi arkhiv noveishei istorii hereafter RGANI, fond 5, opis 16, delo 698, list 91 – f. 5, op. 16, d. 698, l. 91.
5. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 16, l. 9, lp. 298.
6. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 16, l. 9, lp. 299, 59.
7. Berklavs was a Council of Ministers Deputy Chairman between June 1954 and December 1956, when he returned to the Riga gorkom.
8. RGANI, f. 5, op. 31, d. 59, l. 59.
9. RGANI, f. 5, op. 31, d. 59, l. 60, 208.
10. RGANI, f. 5, op. 31, d. 59, l. 60.
11. RGANI, f. 5, op. 31, d. 59, l. 60, 208–209.
12. LVA-PA, f. 102, apr. 14, l. 8, lp. 83–84.
13. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 59, lp. 6–10; LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 30, lp. 3.
14. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 59, lp. 6–10.
15. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 30, lp. 3–6.
16. LVA-PA, f. 102, apr. 14, l. 8, lp. 83.
17. LVA-PA, f. 102, apr. 14, l. 8, lp. 84.
18. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 59, lp. 6–10.
19. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 30, lp. 4.
20. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 30, lp. 5.
21. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 21, l. 18, lp. 38–39.
22. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 21, l. 52, lp. 46.
23. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 21, l. 52, lp. 46.
24. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 21, l. 52, lp. 41.
25. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 22, l. 15, lp. 81–82.
26. Latvijas Valsts arhīvs hereafter LVA, f. 270, apr. 1-s, l. 849, lp. 178.
27. LVA, f. 270, apr. 1-s, l. 439, lp. 158.
28. LVA, f. 270, apr. 1-s, l. 855, lp. 129–130.
29. RGANI, f. 5, op. 31, d. 54, l. 170.
30. Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi arkhiv ekonomiki hereafter RGAE, f. 1562, op. 36, d. 5, l. 31.
31. LVA, f. 1400, apr. 4, l. 732, lp. 192–194.
32. LVA, f. 270, apr. 1-s, l. 1101, lp. 93–94.
33. LVA, f. 270, apr. 1-s, l. 1132, lp. 19–20.
34. LVA, f. 270, apr. 1-s, l. 1176, lp. 3–4, 6.
35. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 76, lp. 5, 128.
36. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 19, l. 76, lp. 108–109.
37. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 21, l. 82, lp. 17–18.
38. LVA, f. 270, apr. 1-s, l. 1132, lp.15–19.
39. LVA, f. 1400, apr. 4, l. 732.
40. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 21, l. 82, lp. 3, 59.
41. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 23, l. 141, lp. 81–82.
42. LVA, f. 1400, apr. 4, l. 690, lp. 129.
43. RGANI, f. 2, op. 1, d. 374, l. 143.
44. LVA-PA, f. 101, apr. 22, l. 15, lp. 12.