![Sample our Computer Science journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5928/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Computer-Science.jpg"})
Abstract
When a two-level multilevel model (MLM) is used for repeated growth data, the individuals constitute level 2 and the successive measurements constitute level 1, which is nested within the individuals that make up level 2. The heterogeneity among individuals is represented by either the random-intercept or random-coefficient (slope) model. The variance components at level 1 involve serial effects and measurement errors under constant variance or heteroscedasticity. This study hypothesizes that missing serial effects or/and heteroscedasticity may bias the results obtained from two-level models. To illustrate this effect, we conducted two simulation studies, where the simulated data were based on the characteristics of an empirical mouse tumour data set. The results suggest that for repeated growth data with constant variance (measurement error) and misspecified serial effects (ρ > 0.3), the proportion of level-2 variation (intra-class correlation coefficient) increases with ρ and the two-level random-coefficient model is the minimum AIC (or AICc) model when compared with the fixed model, heteroscedasticity model, and random-intercept model. In addition, the serial effect (ρ > 0.1) and heteroscedasticity are both misspecified, implying that the two-level random-coefficient model is the minimum AIC (or AICc) model when compared with the fixed model and random-intercept model. This study demonstrates that missing serial effects and/or heteroscedasticity may indicate heterogeneity among individuals in repeated growth data (mixed or two-level MLM). This issue is critical in biomedical research.