44
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methods and Techniques

Anticipated Group Versus Individual Examinations: A Classroom Comparison

, &
Pages 13-17 | Published online: 07 Feb 2008
 

Abstract

Instructors across disciplines continue to seek methods to improve students' retention of class material. One potential method for increasing retention is the use of collaborative, or group, testing. We tested the hypothesis that group testing would lead to greater retention than individual testing. Two instructors, teaching 2 sections of their respective courses, alternated testing formats across the 2 courses. Participants were 147 students from 4 separate undergraduate psychology courses (2 per instructor). Participants taking the group test initially scored higher than those taking the individual test. However, after 3 weeks, with retesting on a subset of questions, there was no significant difference in retention between group versus individual test takers. These findings call into question the value of collaborative testing.

Notes

1 We investigated the potential effects of instructor and course as a between-participants independent variable, but this variable did not meaningfully affect the interpretation of results; therefore, we removed it from the analyses.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.