Figures & data
Figure 1. Representation of 30 × 25 cm yellow sticky trap (in landscape orientation), divided into 12 columns, 10 rows, and 120 2.5 × 2.5 cm squares.
![Figure 1. Representation of 30 × 25 cm yellow sticky trap (in landscape orientation), divided into 12 columns, 10 rows, and 120 2.5 × 2.5 cm squares.](/cms/asset/0746fa0a-4c97-4427-8a13-7c87bb50de2d/tnzc_a_1508043_f0001_ob.jpg)
Figure 2. TPP collected (TPP.cm−2) on different coloured sticky traps over a 7 d period under natural light conditions in a heavily infested glasshouse tomato crop.
![Figure 2. TPP collected (TPP.cm−2) on different coloured sticky traps over a 7 d period under natural light conditions in a heavily infested glasshouse tomato crop.](/cms/asset/adbb2548-8f51-469c-a34e-b4fe0ea1f6f1/tnzc_a_1508043_f0002_ob.jpg)
Figure 3. The (A) density (TPP.cm−2) and (B) coefficient of variation (%) of TPP collected over 7 d on yellow sticky traps set at different heights in a glasshouse containing a heavily infested tomato crop.
![Figure 3. The (A) density (TPP.cm−2) and (B) coefficient of variation (%) of TPP collected over 7 d on yellow sticky traps set at different heights in a glasshouse containing a heavily infested tomato crop.](/cms/asset/3f015e65-b2af-4f13-9786-3aac969738dd/tnzc_a_1508043_f0003_ob.jpg)
Figure 4. TPP collected (TPP.cm−2) on different coloured sticky traps with UV illumination over a 7 d period in a heavily infested glasshouse tomato crop.
![Figure 4. TPP collected (TPP.cm−2) on different coloured sticky traps with UV illumination over a 7 d period in a heavily infested glasshouse tomato crop.](/cms/asset/5dc546c2-d0ad-46e8-8a71-40b1f36481e7/tnzc_a_1508043_f0004_ob.jpg)
Figure 5. Heat maps illustrating relative TPP counts in each 2.5 cm square on a yellow sticky trap for seven sampling periods (7 d). Traps were maintained under normal glasshouse light conditions or under a UV lamp. Scale ranges from deep red (highest count) to dark blue (lowest count) for that trap.
![Figure 5. Heat maps illustrating relative TPP counts in each 2.5 cm square on a yellow sticky trap for seven sampling periods (7 d). Traps were maintained under normal glasshouse light conditions or under a UV lamp. Scale ranges from deep red (highest count) to dark blue (lowest count) for that trap.](/cms/asset/7b12fee0-dc3c-4a5c-99d3-43f48e3e44cc/tnzc_a_1508043_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. The effect of distance from the trap edge on the mean (standardised count) and variation (CV%) of TPP on yellow sticky traps collected over 7 d under (A,C) normal glasshouse light conditions and (B, D) under UV illumination. Different circle shades represent data from different weekly sampling periods.
![Figure 6. The effect of distance from the trap edge on the mean (standardised count) and variation (CV%) of TPP on yellow sticky traps collected over 7 d under (A,C) normal glasshouse light conditions and (B, D) under UV illumination. Different circle shades represent data from different weekly sampling periods.](/cms/asset/22e696e5-1f66-4fec-857f-77ed82573798/tnzc_a_1508043_f0006_ob.jpg)
Figure 7. Relationships between the numbers of Inner Board 2.5 cm squares used for TPP assessment and the proportion of simulated estimates that were a given deviance from the actual mean count for seven sampling periods (7 d). Traps were maintained under normal glasshouse conditions or under a UV lamp.
![Figure 7. Relationships between the numbers of Inner Board 2.5 cm squares used for TPP assessment and the proportion of simulated estimates that were a given deviance from the actual mean count for seven sampling periods (7 d). Traps were maintained under normal glasshouse conditions or under a UV lamp.](/cms/asset/11071a6b-14c0-47e6-951c-c9edd05e2978/tnzc_a_1508043_f0007_ob.jpg)