Figures & data
Table 1. Case selection for the survey experiment.
Figure 1. Average Treatment Effect of experts’ endorsements on support for COVID-19 measures. Note: both countries (black), UK (dark grey) and Germany (light grey), whiskers are 95% confidence intervals.
![Figure 1. Average Treatment Effect of experts’ endorsements on support for COVID-19 measures. Note: both countries (black), UK (dark grey) and Germany (light grey), whiskers are 95% confidence intervals.](/cms/asset/d7a38f40-5794-408e-b585-e07a649b3c7f/fwep_a_1873630_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 2. Interaction between expertise and treatment (H2), both countries.
Figure 2. Adjusted predictions based on Model 4 focussing on the World Health Organisation. Note: whiskers are 95% confidence intervals, visualisation based on package written by Helmdag (Citation2018).
![Figure 2. Adjusted predictions based on Model 4 focussing on the World Health Organisation. Note: whiskers are 95% confidence intervals, visualisation based on package written by Helmdag (Citation2018).](/cms/asset/7dbb2e17-0e3f-4e83-b779-e35cbec3166b/fwep_a_1873630_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 3. Interaction between expertise and treatment (H2).
Table 4. Interaction between neutrality and treatment (H3), both countries.
Table 5. Interaction between exposure and treatment (H4), both countries.