1,361
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Politicized and depoliticized ethnicities, power relations and temporality: insights to outsider research from comparative and transnational fieldwork

ORCID Icon &
Pages 2067-2084 | Received 16 Oct 2016, Accepted 22 Jun 2017, Published online: 14 Jul 2017
 

ABSTRACT

The insider and outsider positions in migration studies have conventionally been approached in terms of ethnic or national belonging. Recently scholars have problematized the essentialist approaches to these roles by arguing for the inclusion of multiple intersecting social locations that are at play in the constitution of researcher positionality. Less attention has been paid, however, on how different ethnicities are constructed and how they can become politicized and depoliticized at particular moments during the research process. This article discusses the fieldwork experiences of two “apparent outsiders” to the studied diaspora community. Drawing from our experiences in multi-sited and comparative fieldwork on the Kurdish diaspora, we argue that rather than taking insider and outsider positions as a starting-point to understand researcher positionality, scholars need to look at particular moments of insiderness and outsiderness to grasp how the researcher’s assumed ethnicity becomes politicized and depoliticized during ethnographic fieldwork.

Acknowledgements

Authors contributed equally to this article and are listed alphabetically. The authors also wish to thank the participants of “Ethnographic encounters” seminar organized at the University of Turku, 12th–13th May 2016, Professor Hilary Pilkington, Dr. Elly Harrowell and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 Within the constraints of this article, we will only focus on the assumed ethnicity/national belonging and when relevant how it intertwines with assumed religious, social and political belonging.

2 The Kurdish language was banned in Turkey until the 1990s as a result of decades long assimilation policies by the state.

3 See US Department of State, “Foreign Terrorist Organizations”: http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm.

4 The term “white Turk” is used to describe a person who is wealthy, educated, Westernized, urbanized or a person who has a privileged status in Turkey.

Additional information

Funding

The authors wish to thank Coventry University, Stellenbosch University, National Research Foundation of South Africa, the University of Turku, the School for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences (EHESS) and the Academy of Finland for financial and other support that enabled the completion of this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 174.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.