Figures & data
Figure 1. A bar graph showing Examiner 1’s scores given to each of the students in a station (Wong et al. Citation2020).
![Figure 1. A bar graph showing Examiner 1’s scores given to each of the students in a station (Wong et al. Citation2020).](/cms/asset/d36b7908-09dc-4131-87ac-14877a904db6/imte_a_2049734_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2. Boxplots comparing an examiner’s score with the other examiners in the same station (Wong et al. Citation2020).
![Figure 2. Boxplots comparing an examiner’s score with the other examiners in the same station (Wong et al. Citation2020).](/cms/asset/ed41b748-a1c4-4fc2-acd9-dd2e4ffaa06b/imte_a_2049734_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. A bar graph comparing an examiner’s mean percentage score given to students with the entire cohort of examiners (Wong et al. Citation2020).
![Figure 3. A bar graph comparing an examiner’s mean percentage score given to students with the entire cohort of examiners (Wong et al. Citation2020).](/cms/asset/8a22eb48-6ba3-4350-9ed8-d8c7d232ee67/imte_a_2049734_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 1. Two themes and the associated enablers and barriers that influenced the effectiveness of structured feedback.