248
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Validation of collection of 6 MODIS/Terra and MODIS/Aqua gross primary production in an alpine meadow of the Northern Tibetan Plateau

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 4517-4534 | Received 19 Oct 2016, Accepted 17 Apr 2017, Published online: 22 May 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) continuously monitors gross primary production (GPP), which is an extremely important component of carbon cycling, at the global scale. Uncertainties about MODIS GPP limit our ability to accurately quantify GPP at the regional scales. The Collection 6 MODIS/Terra and MODIS/Aqua GPP products (i.e. MOD17A2H and MYD17A2H) were compared with the estimated GPP (GPPEC) by eddy covariance measurements in an alpine meadow in the Northern Tibetan Plateau during three consecutive growing seasons of 2005–2007. The Collection 6 MODIS/Terra and MODIS/Aqua fractional photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) products (i.e. MOD15A2H and MYD15A2H) were also validated. The MOD17A2H and MYD17A2H products tended to overestimate GPPEC by 2.17% and 7.35% in 2005–2007, respectively, although these differences were not significant. The MOD15A2H and MYD15A2H products also tended to overestimate ground-based FPAR (FPARG) by 20.31% and 24.73% in 2005–2007, respectively. The overestimation of FPAR resulted in about 17.51–23.97% overestimation of GPPEC. The default maximum light-use efficiency (εmax) of 0.86 g C MJ−1 only underestimated the ground-based εmax (0.88 g C MJ−1) by 2.27%, which in turn resulted in about 2.13–2.72% underestimation of GPPEC. The meteorology data errors only caused about 0.48–1.06% underestimation of GPPEC. Therefore, although MODIS Collection 6 GPP had a very high accuracy, the input parameters had relative greater errors in the alpine meadow of the Northern Tibetan Plateau. The differences between MODIS GPP and GPPEC mainly resulted from FPAR, followed by εmax and meteorological data.

Acknowledgement

We thank the editor and reviewers for their insightful and valuable comments, which greatly improved the quality of this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31600432), the Natural Science Foundation of Tibet Autonomous Region (response of species richness and aboveground biomass to warming in the alpine meadows of Tibet), Youth Innovation Research Team Project of Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling (LENOM2016Q0002), National Key Research Projects of China (2016YFC0502005), Chinese Academy of Science Western Light Talents Program (response of livestock carrying capability to climatic change and grazing in the alpine meadow of Northern Tibetan Plateau), the Science and Technology Plan Projects of Tibet Autonomous Region (Forage Grass Industry), and the National Science and Technology Plan Project of China (Nos. 2013BAC04B01, 2011BAC09B03).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 689.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.