Words as interventions: naming in the Palestine – Israel conflict

Abstract

This paper examines the practice of naming events, actions, places and people in the Palestine – Israel conflict. It explores the way colonialism and the national project deploy transformations in naming to construct places and identities and craft widespread imaginaries about these places. Names form part of cultural systems that structure and nuance the way we imagine and understand the world. They embody ideological significance and moral attributes and can be consciously mobilised for various projects of power. Words and names reference a moral grammar that underwrites and reproduces power. As such, our analytical approaches to lexicons must be embedded in historical, political and cultural frameworks.

Notes

J Beinin, ‘The new American McCarthyism: policing thought about the Middle East’, Race and Class, 46 (1), 2004, pp 101 – 115.

S Gasteyer & C Butler Flora, ‘Modernizing the savage: colonization and perceptions of landscape and lifescape’, Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (1), 2002, pp 28 – 149.

M Martha, M Haritos-Fatouros & P Zimbardo, Violence Workers. Police Torturers and Murderers Reconstruct Brazilian Atrocities, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002, p 27.

See the account of a legal case in which Palestinian memories and narratives of what happened in the village of Tantoura in 1948 were challenged and subjected to a legal process of exclusion and denial of truthfulness. S Esmeir, ‘Law, history, and memory’, Social Text, 21 (2), 2003, pp 25 – 48.

W Khalidi (ed), A11 that Remains: The Palestinian Villages Occupied and Depopulated by Israel in 1948, Washington, DC: Institute for Palestine Studies, 1992, p 582.

M Trouillet, Silencing the Past. Power and the Production of History, Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1995, pp 113, 114.

J Beinin, ‘The Israelization of American Middle East policy discourse’, Social Text, 21 (2), 2003, pp 124 – 139.

N Dirks, ‘From little king to landlord; colonial discourse and colonial rule’, in Dirks (ed), In Colonialism and Culture (Comparative Studies in Society and History Book Series), Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1993, pp 175 – 208.

D Harvey, ‘From space to place and back again: reflections on the condition of post-modernity’, in J Bird et al (eds), Mapping the Future. Local Cultures, Global Change, London: Routledge, 1993, pp 3 – 29.

J Peteet, Landscape of Hope and Despair: Place and Identity in Palestinian Refugee Camps, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005 (in press).

E Said, ‘Invention, memory, and place’, in W Mitchell (ed), Landscape and Power, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2002, pp 241 – 259, p 248.

S Schama, Landscape and Memory, New York: Knopf, 1995, p 61.

M Benvenisti, Sacred Landscape: The Buried History of the Holy Land Since 1948, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000, p 2. See also S Cohen & N Kliot, ‘Place-names in Israel's ideological struggle over the Administrative Territories’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82 (4), 1992, pp 653 – 680.

L Jayyusi, ‘The grammar of difference; the Palestinian/Israeli conflict as a moral site’, in A Moors, T van Teeffelen, S Kanaana & I Abu Ghazaleh (eds), Discourse and Palestine: Power, Text and Context, Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, 1995, p 124.

J Bauman, ‘A designer heritage. Israeli national parks and the politics of historical representation’, Middle East Report, 196, September – October 1995, pp 16 – 19. See also S Slyomovics, The Object of Memory. Arab and Jew Narrate the Palestinian Village, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998; and Khalidi, Al1 that Remains.

S Katz ‘Adam and Adama, ‘Ird and Ard: en-gendering political conflict and identity in early Jewish and Palestinian nationalisms’, in D Kandiyoti (ed), Gendering the Middle East: Emerging Perspectives, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1996, pp 85 – 105.

E Shohat, ‘Exile, diaspora, and return: the inscription of Palestine in Zionist discourse’, in Moors et al, Discourse and Palestine, p 233.

J Goldberg, ‘Among the settlers. Will they destroy Israel?’, The New Yorker, 31 May 2004, pp 48 – 69.

A Shammas, ‘A lost voice’, New York Times Magazine, 28 April 1991, pp 34 – 35, 48, 78 – 79.

A Shammas, ‘Palestinians must now master the art of forgetting’, New York Times Magazine, 26 December 1993, pp 32 – 33.

Shammas, ‘A lost voice’.

Peteet, Landscape of Hope and Despair.

R Fisk, ‘cnn caves in to Israel over its references to illegal settlements’, 2001, at www.bintjbeil.com/E/occupation/.

fair, Media Advisory: Euphemisms for Israeli Settlements Confuse Coverage, 26 June 2002.

R Khalidi, Palestinian Identity. The Construction of Modern National Consciousness, New York: Columbia University Press, 1997, p 14.

L Jayyusi, ‘The grammar of difference’.

E Khoury, The Kingdom of Strangers, Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Press, 1996, pp 25 – 27.

GC Spivak, ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in P Williams & L Chrisman (eds), Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory, New York: Columbia University Press, 1994, p 76.

C Nagengast, ‘Violence, terror, and the crisis of the state’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 1994, p 112.

T Swedenburg, ‘The Palestinian peasant as a national signifier’, Anthropological Quarterly, 63 (1), 1990, p 13.

N Masalha, Expulsion of the Palestinians. The Concept of Transfer in Zionist Political Thought, 1882 – 1948, Washington, DC: Institute for Palestine Studies, 1992, p 30.

Goldberg, ‘Among the settlers’.

Ibid, p 48

L Hajjar, ‘Sovereign bodies, sovereign states and the problem of torture’, Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, 21, 2000, pp 101 – 134.

J Whitbeck, ‘“Terrorism”: the word itself is dangerous’, Global Dialogue, 4 (2), 2002, pp 59 – 65.

M McAlister, Epic Encounters. Culture, Media, and US Interests in the Middle East, 1945 – 2000, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001, pp 157, 187.

There is Palestinian debate and disagreement over the political wisdom and legitimacy of attacks on Israelis, which fluctuates with the political – military situation. In general, Fatah does not consider permissible attacks on Israeli civilians inside the Green line, while Hamas fluctuates between accepting this and, at other times, claiming that Israelis, occupying Palestinian land since 1948, can be attacked anywhere.

Fisk, ‘cnn caves in to Israel over its references to illegal settlements’.

J Bourne, ‘Anti-Semitism or anti-criticism? A review article’, Race and Class, 46 (1), 2004, p 135.