![Sample our Social Sciences journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110822/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Social-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
The Eurozone crisis has rekindled the debate on the democratic deficit of the European Union (EU). In this paper, the debate is reconsidered by contrasting the modus vivendi of ‘We the People’ in the USA with the modus vivendi of ‘We the Heads of States’ in the EU. It is demonstrated that many of the solutions to the alleged democratic deficit focus on how more voice can be given to ‘We the People’ on the input side, but that this goes against the functional logic of the EU system, thereby undermining its ability to govern. Instead, we argue that more attention should be given to how to increase output legitimacy, and a number of proposals are put forward. Such a reshuffling of the analytical focus is the best way forward to escape the current impasse in the debate on how to ‘fix’ democracy in the EU.
Notes on contributors
Henrik Bang is a Professor in governance. He publishes extensively within the fields of governance and political participation. His most recent work is a book about Michel Foucault's political framework: Government by Truth. (In production by Palgrave).
Mads Dagnis Jensen is an Associate Professor at the Department of Society and Globalisation at Roskilde University. He has co-authored two books, edited a number of special issues and published articles in international journals such as Government and Opposition, the Journal of Common Market Studies, the Journal of European Public Policy and Policy Studies. He is currently working on a large-scale research project on EU coordination.