Construction logistics in a multi-project context: coopetition among main contractors and the role of third-party logistics providers

Figures & data

Figure 1. The ARA Model, adapted from Håkansson (1987).

Table 1. Summary of interviews.

Respondents	Duration
Site manager, Contractor 1a	48 min
Site manager, Contractor 2a	55 min
Site manager, contractors 3 and 6 (the site manager changed employer)	39 min
Site manager, Contractor 4	1 h 11 min
Site manager, Contractor 8	1 h 1 minute
Supervisor, Contractor 6	39 min
Stage Coordinator 1, TPL provider	1 h 15 min
Stage Coordinator 2, TPL provider	59 min
Stage Coordinator 3, TPL provider	1 h 14 min
BLC manager, TPL provider	47 min
Production manager of implementation, City	1 h 42 min

Table 2. Description of construction projects and main contractors in the studied stage.

Contractor	Description of project
Contractor 1a	Development of 45 condominiums.
Contractor 1b	Development of 60 condominiums.
Contractor 1c	Landscaping and civil works between and around the projects by contractors 3, 4, 5, and 7, as well as civil works in the studied stage on behalf of the City.
Contractor 2a	Development of 130 tenancy apartments.
Contractor 2b	Development of 81 tenancy apartments.
Contractor 3	Development of 90 condominiums.
Contractor 4	Development of 43 tenancy apartments.
Contractor 5	Development of 44 condominiums.
Contractor 6	Development of 85 condominiums.
Contractor 7	Development of two town houses.
Contractor 8	Landscaping and civil works between and around the projects by contractors 2b, 4, and 6.

Figure 2. Disposition plan of the studied stage.

Håkansson, H., 1987. Industrial technological development: a network approach. New York: Croom Helm.

 Google Scholar