Abstract
The present study utilized a scale that measured Bevan, Hale, and Williams' (2004) serial argumentation goals and associated these goals with the perceived resolvability of the serial argument and serial argument conflict tactics. College students reporting on current and former dating partnerships completed a written survey containing close-ended items. Six of Bevan et al.'s (2004) ten original goals again emerged from data analyses, and the four remaining goals combined to form a single goal. These seven serial argument goals were related to perceived resolvability and conflict tactics in generally expected ways.
The authors wish to thank Norman C. H. Wong for his assistance in data collection and entry on this project.
Notes
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2006 meeting of the Western States Communication Association in Palm Springs, CA. These data were collected while the first author was at the University of Georgia.