Publication Cover
Leisure Sciences
An Interdisciplinary Journal
Volume 40, 2018 - Issue 6
601
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Linking the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum with Travel Spending: A Spatial Analysis in West Virginia

&
Pages 508-532 | Received 02 Feb 2016, Accepted 06 Sep 2016, Published online: 31 Jan 2017
 

ABSTRACT

This article presents results from a mapping and analysis of the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) for West Virginia using the Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and GeoDa. Results show visitors' travel spending is significantly related to the urban class of the ROS spectrum, although this class only accounts for 3.3% of all ROS classes. It seems that the role of the urban class in generating travel spending had become less important in 2012 compared to 2010. These findings suggest a balanced development strategy be adopted, and more efforts should be put on the conservation of rural landscapes for the promotion of authentic rural tourism in the state. Rural tourism, we argue, will be more sustainable in the long run than the gambling industry, which has been declining in recent years because of increasing competition from surrounding states.

Funding

This study was funded to the second author by the USDA McIntire-Stennis Program (Grant numbers 0206012 and 0230037).

Notes

1 The Appalachian Regional Commission (Citation2016) classifies the region's counties into one of five economic levels: distressed, at-risk, transitional, competitive, and attainment. This classification approach involves three economic indicators: three-year average unemployment rate, per capita market income, and poverty rate, which are compared with national averages by converting them to percent values. The resulting percent values are summed and averaged to create a composite index value for each county, which is then ranked, based on its composite index value, with higher values indicating higher levels of distress. The worst 10% of U.S. counties are classified as distressed counties, worst 11–25% as at-risk counties, best 11–25% as competitive counties, best 10% as attainment counties, and the remaining 50% as transitional counties. This five-level classification approach was adopted in our study to classify all counties in West Virginia into one of five naturalness levels: “Least Wild & Wonderful,” “Somewhat Wild & Wonderful,” “Moderately Wild & Wonderful,” “Highly Wild & Wonderful,” and “Most Wild & Wonderful.”

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 242.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.