Selective toluene methylation to p-xylene: current status & future perspective

ABSTRACT

Industrially, petroleum naphtha reforming and steam cracking are two major multistep and energy-intensive sources for p-xylene production. Additionally, p-xylene is also produced by selective toluene disproportionation, heavy (C₉) aromatics trans-alkylation and isomerization of xylenes. Rapidly changing market dynamics from fuels to petrochemicals coupled with growing petrochemicals demand has led to the further exploration of economical and highly p-xylene selective processes by using surplus low-value aromatics. Methylation of toluene with methanol has been envisaged as one such potential opportunity to produce p-xylene. For the purpose, significant efforts have been made in the past forty years to develop suitable shape selective zeolite catalysts and technologies to make toluene methylation a highly p-xylene selective process. Current paper briefly highlights various advancements in the toluene methylation process development and aims to provide an extensive review of several works put up in the past to design suitable catalysts, catalyst’s limitations and developmental challenges for toluene methylation. Further, this paper provides an useful insight for two competing chemistries of toluene alkylation and side-by-side methanol reactions. Finally, motivated by competitive chemistry of methanol conversion reactions, existing catalytic limitations and novel synthesis opportunities in engineering shape selective zeolite catalysis, a way forward is proposed to arrive at a logical and futuristic catalyst design strategy for p-xylene production via toluene methylation. The proposed strategy is envisaged to offer low-to-moderate catalyst acidity, improved toluene methylation activity, high p-xylene selectivity and improved catalyst life which, otherwise, up till now have been the bottlenecks to develop distinctly economical toluene alkylation to p-xylene process.

KEYWORDS:

• Methylation
• toluene
• p-xylene
• selectivity
• conversion
• catalyst design
• reaction mechanism

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to greatly acknowledge BPCL management for granting the permission to publish this work.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).