Publication Cover
Neurological Research
A Journal of Progress in Neurosurgery, Neurology and Neurosciences
Volume 44, 2022 - Issue 7
350
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Paper

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of erythropoietin and acetyl-l-carnitine on sciatic nerve injury in rats

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 659-666 | Received 14 Sep 2021, Accepted 11 Jan 2022, Published online: 06 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Aim

We aimed to investigate the effects of erythropoietin, acetyl-l-carnitine, and their combination on nerve regeneration in experimental peripheral nerve injury.

Methods

Rats were randomly divided into five groups – sham-operated (S), sciatic nerve crush injury (C), C + acetyl-l-carnitine (ALCAR), C + erythropoietin (EPO), and C + EPO + ALCAR. ALCAR (50 mg/kg/day) was administered intraperitoneally, and EPO (5000 U/kg) was injected subcutaneously for 10 days. Functional recovery was evaluated using walking track analysis (sciatic functional index [SFI]), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) assay, and caspase-3 and S100 immunoreactivities.

Results

In SFI analyses, delayed functional recovery was observed in the C group, whereas the functional recovery of rats treated with EPO and ALCAR significantly improved. The latencies of the SEP components were significantly prolonged in C group. In the treatment groups (C + EPO, C + ALCAR, and C + EPO + ALCAR), all recorded values of SEP components significantly decreased. TBARS levels in C group were significantly higher than those in the S group. EPO and ALCAR administration significantly decreased TBARS levels. Caspase-3 immunoreactivity was increased in the C group, whereas it was decreased in the treatment groups. S100 immunolabelling was significantly decreased in the C group. EPO and ALCAR administration caused an increase in the amount of S100-positive cells in all treatment groups.

Conclusion

EPO and ALCAR administration could accelerate sciatic nerve repair by reducing apoptosis and lipid peroxidation and promoting myelinization. Although both EPO and ALCAR had positive effects on nerve healing, their combined efficacy had no statistically significant effect on peripheral nerve regeneration.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (O.H.) on reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Research Foundation of Akdeniz University, Turkey (project number: 2011.01.0103.005).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 421.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.