473
Views
29
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reports

Fecal Water as a Non-Invasive Biomarker in Nutritional Intervention: Comparison of Preparation Methods and Refinement of Different Endpoints

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 158-167 | Received 20 Mar 2006, Accepted 16 Oct 2006, Published online: 05 Dec 2007
 

Abstract:

The assessment of cellular effects by the aqueous phase of human feces (fecal water, FW) is a useful biomarker approach to study cancer risks and protective activities of food. In order to refine and develop the biomarker, different protocols of preparing FW were compared. Fecal waters were prepared by 3 methods: (A) direct centrifugation; (B) extraction of feces in PBS before centrifugation; and (C) centrifugation of lyophilized and reconstituted feces. Genotoxicity was determined in colon cells using the Comet assay. Selected samples were investigated for additional parameters related to carcinogenesis. Two of 7 FWs obtained by methods A and B were similarly genotoxic. Method B, however, yielded higher volumes of FW, allowing sterile filtration for long-term culture experiments. Four of 7 samples were non-genotoxic when prepared according to all 3 methods. FW from lyophilized feces and from fresh samples were equally genotoxic. FWs modulated cytotoxicity, paracellular permeability, and invasion, independent of their genotoxicity. All 3 methods of FW preparation can be used to assess genotoxicity. The higher volumes of FW obtained by preparation method B greatly enhance the perspectives of measuring different types of biological parameters and using these to disclose activities related to cancer development.

Acknowledgments and Notes

This project was supported by the European Communities, specific RTD program “Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources,” Key Action 1 “Food, Nutrition and Health,” project number QLK1-1999-00346 -SYNCAN. We are grateful to Eva Gietl for technical assistance and to Claudia Lüdtke for excellent secretarial assistance.

Notes

†Each value represents the data of 7 volunteers from 3 independent experiments (mean ± SD).

∗Significantly different compared to NaCl control.

Each value represents the data of one volunteer from 3 independent experiments (mean ± SD). TI = tail intensity.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.