3,400
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cancer Cachexia: Identification by Clinical Assessment versus International Consensus Criteria in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

, , , &
Pages 1322-1329 | Received 13 Dec 2017, Accepted 05 Jul 2018, Published online: 20 Sep 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Study flowchart.

Figure 1. Study flowchart.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics for the total study population and for cachectic vs. non-cachectic patients.

Figure 2. Frequency of criteria for cachexia according to the Fearon et al. criteria. In total, 36 out of 69 patients fulfilled one or more of the Fearon et al. criteria for cachexia.

Figure 2. Frequency of criteria for cachexia according to the Fearon et al. criteria. In total, 36 out of 69 patients fulfilled one or more of the Fearon et al. criteria for cachexia.

Table 2. Cancer cachexia – agreement between identification by clinical assessment vs. Fearon et al. criteria.

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who are cachectic vs. not cachectic based on the Fearon et al. criteria (a) and based on clinical assessment (b).

Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who are cachectic vs. not cachectic based on the Fearon et al. criteria (a) and based on clinical assessment (b).