246
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Vitamin B12 Supplementation and Vitamin B12 Blood Serum Levels: Evaluation of Effect Modification by Gender and Smoking Status

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 2373-2383 | Received 30 Jul 2021, Accepted 11 Nov 2021, Published online: 24 Nov 2021
 

Abstract

Research suggests that high intake of supplemental vitamin B12 may be associated with increased risk of cancer, with some evidence that this association may vary by gender and smoking status. This investigation evaluates if similar patterns in association are observed for data for 11,757 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2006). Survey-weighted multivariable-adjusted linear regression was used to evaluate the association between regular B12 supplement use and log-transformed serum B12 levels. Persons taking vitamin B12 through a multivitamin/multimineral (MVMM) had a median supplemental intake of 12 mcg/day (Q1: 6, Q3: 25), compared to 100 mcg/day (Q1: 22, Q3: 500) for persons reporting supplemental B12 intake through a MVMM-exclusive source. MVMM users had a geometric mean serum B12 26% (95% CI: 23%-30%) higher than nonusers, whereas MVMM-exclusive users’ geometric mean was 61% (95% CI: 53%-70%) higher than nonusers (p-trend < 0.001). Although a positive trend (p-trend < 0.001) was observed for both men and women, the association was stronger among women (p-interaction < 0.001). No interaction was observed for smoking status (p-interaction = 0.45). B12 supplementation is associated with higher levels of serum B12, with significant interaction by gender but not smoking. Further work is needed to better understand the interplay of B12 and gender.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Memorial Sloan Kettering Quantitative Science Undergraduate Research Experience, an NCI-funded training grant (R25 CA214255).

Declaration of Interest Statement

Authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Authors’ Contributions

HEF and EDK designed the study, with additional consultation from KO, MD, SLN, and TMB. HEF and KO conducted the statistical analyses. KO managed the database. HEF, EDK, KO, MD, SLN, and TMB aided in interpreting results. HEF and EDK drafted the manuscript in consultation, with edits provided by KO, MD, SLN, and TMB.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Grant R25 CA214255 and P30 CA008748.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 633.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.