ABSTRACT
Computer crime—specifically, software piracy—is growing, and no research in criminology examines whether low self-control can help us understand the behavior. This study examines the link that Gottfredson and Hirschi's (1990) idea of low self-control has with software piracy. Using a nonrandom sample of college students and measures of low self-control, software pirating peers, software pirating attitudes, and moral beliefs toward software piracy, the findings show that low self-control has a link with software piracy. This finding expands the scope of self-control theory and provides an understanding of why the behavior occurs.
Acknowledgments
Notes
1Important to Gottfredson and Hirschi's (Citation1990) theory is opportunity. In this study, the scenarios provide the student with access to the software and the means to pirate the software, making opportunity equal for all of the students in the study (see Bichler-Robertson et al. Citation2003 for a similar view).
2Some may argue that this measure has problems with validity (see Piquero, MacIntosh, and Hickman Citation2001; DeLisi et al. Citation2003; Weibe Citation2003). However, others show that the attitude measure performs as well as behavioral measures (Pratt and Cullen Citation2000; Unnever, Cullen, and Pratt Citation2003). To examine the Grasmick et al. (Citation1993) scale for the current study, each factor (impulsivity, simple tasks, risk-taking, physical, self-centered, and temper) were correlated. The findings from this correlation showed that all the factors had positive significant correlations with each other. Further, regression analysis was performed using each factor and the dependent measure to determine if any of the factors would have any opposite effects from the other factors. The findings from this analysis showed that all the factors had a positive influence on the dependent measure. Thus, the findings from these analyses show that the Grasmick et al. scale is suitable for use in the current study. Due to the conservation of space, specific coefficients are not presented here, but they are available from the author upon request.
3This measure may not accurately capture the full range of differential association measures (see Tittle, Burk, and Jackson Citation1986; Mazerolle et al. Citation2000). However, research of differential association contains several studies that use measures similar to these (see Akers et al. Citation1979; Krohn et al. Citation1985; Winfree, Griffiths, and Sellers Citation1989; Skinner and Fream Citation1997; Reed and Rose Citation1998; Akers and Lee Citation1999). In addition, the measure captures the exposure to deviant attitudes similar to other studies that use deviant peer association as a control variable in self-control theory (see Evans et al. Citation1997; Winfree and Bernat Citation1998; Burton et al. Citation1998).
*Denotes statistical significance at the .05 level.
*Denotes statistical significance at the .05 level.
4An additional subsample analysis was conducted that combined both software pirating peers and software pirating attitudes. In this analysis, low self-control was not significant in any of the subsamples. This suggests that this combination of measures may not completely condition the effect of low self-control on this particular form of software piracy. Due to space limits, these findings are available from the author upon request.
Gottfredson
,
Michael R.
, and
Travis
Hirschi
.
1990
.
A General Theory of Crime
. Stanford , CA :
Stanford University Press
.
Bichler-Robertson
,
Giesla
,
Marissa C.
Potchak
, and
Stephen G.
Tibbetts
.
2003
. “
Low Self-Control, Opportunity, and Strain in Students’ Reported Cheating Behavior
.”
Journal of Crime and Justice
26
:
23
–
53
.
Piquero
,
Alex R.
,
Randall
Macintosh
, and
Matthew
Hickman
.
2001
. “
Does Self-Control Affect Survey Response? Applying Exploratory, Confirmatory, and Item Response Theory Analysis to Grasmick et al.'s Self-Control Scale
.”
Criminology
38
:
897
–
930
.
Delisi
,
Matt
,
Andy
Hochstetler
, and
Daniel S.
Murphy
.
2003
. “
Self-Control Behind Bars: A Validation Study of the Grasmick et al. Scale
.”
Justice Quarterly
20
:
241
–
63
.
Weibe
,
Richard P.
.
2003
. “
Reconciling Psychopathy and Low Self-Control
.”
Justice Quarterly
20
:
297
–
336
.
Pratt
,
Travis C.
, and
Francis T.
Cullen
.
2000
. “
The Empirical Status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime: A Meta-Analysis
.”
Criminology
38
:
931
–
64
.
Unnever
,
James D.
, and
Dewey G.
Cornell
.
2003
. “
Bullying, Self-Control, and ADHD
.”
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
18
:
129
–
47
.
Grasmick
,
Harold G.
,
Charles R.
Tittle
,
Robert J.
Bursik
,
Jr.
, and
Bruce J.
Arneklev
.
1993
. “
Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime
.”
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
30
:
5
–
29
.
Tittle
,
Charles
,
M.
Burk
, and
E.
Jackson
.
1986
. “
Modeling Sutherland's Differential Association Theory: Toward an Empirical Clarification
.”
Social Forces
65
:
405
–
32
.
Mazerolle
,
Paul
,
Velmer S.
Burton
,
Francis T.
Cullen
,
T.
David Evans
, and
Gary L.
Payne
.
2000
. “
Strain, Anger and Delinquency Adaptations: Specifying General Strain Theory
.”
Journal of Criminal Justice
28
:
89
–
101
.
Akers
,
Ronald L.
,
Marvin D.
Krohn
,
Lonn
Lanza-Kaduce
, and
Marcia
Radosevich
.
1979
. “
Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory
.”
American Sociological Review
44
:
636
–
55
.
Krohn
,
Marvin D.
,
William F.
Skinner
,
James L.
Massey
, and
Ronald L.
Akers
.
1985
. “
Social Learning Theory and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: A Longitudinal Study
.”
Social Problems
32
:
455
–
73
.
Winfree
,
L. Thomas
,
Curt T.
Griffiths
, and
Christine S.
Sellers
.
1989
. “
Social Learning Theory, Drug Use and American Indian Youths: A Cross-Cultural Test
.”
Justice Quarterly
6
:
395
–
417
.
Skinner
,
William F.
, and
Anne M.
Fream
.
1997
. “
A Social Learning Theory Analysis of Computer Crime among College Students
.”
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
34
:
495
–
518
.
Reed
,
Mark D.
, and
Dina R.
Rose
.
1998
. “
Doing What Simple Simon Says? Estimating the Underlying Causal Structures of Delinquent Associations, Attitudes, and Serious Theft
.”
Criminal Justice and Behavior
25
:
240
–
74
.
Akers
,
Ronald L.
, and
Gang
Lee
.
1999
. “
Age, Social Learning, and Social Bonding in Adolescent Substance Use.
”
Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal
19
:
1
–
25
.
Evans
,
David T.
,
Francis T.
Cullen
,
Velmer S.
Burton
,
R.
Gregory Dunaway
, and
Michael L.
Benson
.
1997
. “
The Social Consequences of Self-Control: Testing The General Theory of Crime
.”
Criminology
35
:
475
–
501
.
Winfree
,
L. Thomas
and
Francis P.
Bernat
.
1998
. “
Social Learning, Self-Control and Substance Abuse by Eighth Grade Students: A Tale of Two Cities
.”
Journal of Drug Issues
28
:
539
–
58
.
Burton
,
Velmer S.
,
Francis T.
Cullen
,
T.
David Evans
,
Leanne
Fiftal-Alarid
, and
R.
Gregory Dunaway
.
1998
. “
Gender, Self-Control, and Crime
.”
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
35
:
125
–
47
.