High levels of natal philopatry and no difference in reproductive success between philopatric and non-philopatric songbirds breeding in a native forests of east-central Argentina

ABSTRACT

Philopatric birds have a number of advantages when breeding in familiar habitats, such as learning the locations of food, efficient movement throughout the breeding area, or effective escape from predators. However, few investigators have examined the possible effect of site familiarity on reproductive success, even less for Neotropical songbirds. We studied a breeding population of Masked Gnatcatchers (Polioptila dumicola) and Vermilion Flycatchers (Pyrocephalus rubinus), two south temperate songbirds, and examined the possible reproductive benefits of natal philopatry. In our population, 13.9% and 6.9% of breeding adults, respectively, for Masked Gnatcatchers and Vermilion Flycatchers, were philopatric. We found no difference in the breeding success between philopatric and non-philopatric individuals. Our results showed higher levels of philopatry for both species than previously reported for other songbirds. Because the remnants of native forests in our study area were located within a matrix of highly disturbed habitats, these intermediate-to-high values of natal philopatry could be linked to the structural characteristics of the forest that may force birds to use the few suitable forest patches available in the area.

KEYWORDS:

• Breeding habitats
• masked Gnatcatcher
• Neotropical birds
• south-temperate forests
• Vermilion Flycatcher

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to M. L. Shaw for allowing us to conduct this study in Estancia ‘Luis Chico.’ We thank F. Palacio for assisting us with statistical analyses, and A. Jauregui, M. A. Colombo, J. Paxman, S. Stockli, Sarah Nagl, M. Ospina, E. Grim, D. Haegedus, M. Fontaine, C. Tiernan, A. Wolf, B. Vidrio, A. Valencia, T. Lansley, M. Honeyman, and C. Dudley for help in data collection and nest monitoring. We appreciate the improvements in English usage made by Peter Lowther through the Association of Field Ornithologists’ program of editorial assistance. We thank Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT; grant PICT 2014-3347) for financial support. This study was conducted with research permits from the regional nature conservation authority (Organismo Provincial para el Desarrollo Sostenible, OPDS #003/16, Direccion de Areas Naturales Protegidas, Buenos Aires province, Argentina). LNS is research Fellow of Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET).

Geolocation information

Punta Indio, Buenos Aires, Argentina (point): 35°20’S, 57°11’W.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).