Publication Cover
Orbit
The International Journal on Orbital Disorders, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery
Volume 38, 2019 - Issue 4
201
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Investigation

Unique histopathologic features of the eyelid dermatofibroma

, , ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 274-278 | Received 09 May 2018, Accepted 14 Aug 2018, Published online: 05 Sep 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Dermatofibromas are common cutaneous lesions, but rarely occur in the eyelid skin. The reason for the low incidence in the palpebral skin has not been elucidated. In this study, we analyze the histopathologic features of an illustrative case of dermatofibroma and review previously published cases to determine whether eyelid dermatofibroma develops differently from the prototypical dermatofibroma.

Methods: Histopathologic analysis of a new illustrative case of eyelid dermatofibroma and retrospective review of published cases.

Results: The distinguishing features of the illustrative lesion included a rounder gross appearance, nonacanthotic epithelium, basophilic staining, cellular character, and a paucity of “collagen trapping.” These features deviated from the typical features associated with classic dermatofibroma. Review of the 11 previously published cases of eyelid dermatofibroma revealed that they were more similar in appearance to the illustrative lesion than to classic dermatofibroma.

Discussion: The rarity and histological deviations of the eyelid dermatofibroma suggest that the dermal substrate from which the lesion develops differs from that of the classic dermatofibroma. This difference may be explained microanatomically based on the fact that the dermis of the eyelid is predominantly papillary, whereas the dermis of extrapalpebral skin where dermatofibromas are more common is predominantly reticular.

Conclusions: Although related, eyelid dermatofibromas appear to be histologically distinct from classic dermatofibromas, owing to the unique dermal composition of the site of origin.

Author contributions

AHA, KED, DNS, and MK conceived and designed the study. AHA and CAA collected the data. AHA and DNS analyzed the data. AHA produced an initial draft of the paper. KED, KJG, DNS, and MK contributed to revised drafts and preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 733.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.