Abstract
Four experiments are reported that investigate processing of mispronounced words for which the phonological form is inconsistent with the graphemic form (words spelled with silent letters). Words produced as mispronunciations that are consistent with their spelling were more confusable with their citation form counterpart than mispronunciations that are inconsistent with their spelling in a same/different task. Cross-modal repetition priming for orthographically supported productions and their citation form counterparts was equivalent; in contrast, orthographically unsupported productions showed reduced priming relative to the citation form. The findings are discussed in light of models of cross-modal interaction between spoken and written lexical representations. We argue that the results support a restructuring model where reading promotes development of a phonological representation used during spoken word recognition.
Notes
1To ensure that the five vowel-initial items did not change the data pattern for Experiment 1a, a reanalysis of the data for Experiment 1a was conducted with the five vowel-initial items removed; removal of these items did not change the data pattern (22.6% and 6.65%, orthographically supported and unsupported, respectively).
2A subset of the contexts was used to make the analysis computationally feasible. Note that in all MRC database searches, proper nouns, hyphenated items, and words that did not pass a spell check in Microsoft Excel XP were excluded from the results.